• AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fake: cops obeying the law and following due process? Really?

    Gay: Anon clearly took “be gay, do crimes” seriously… too bad he didn’t take his opsec as seriously…

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    They already showed their cards so they’ll not come back with a warrant. This is more about intimidation than anything else.

    I’ve had the same thing happen to me. “Can we search your house? It will help you if you have nothing to hide”. Fuck off cunts. They didn’t try again.

    • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Can we search your house? It will only help you if you have nothing to hide”.

      Help me how, to get arrested faster? lmao

      “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear” remains at the top of my list of bullshit lines of “reasoning” I’ve ever heard in my entire life.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        I removed the “only” from my text because it was a bit ambiguous.

        But yes it was exactly that. It’s like they consider themselves to be the law. “You’re either with me or against me”. Typical BS.

        It’s mostly cops that think they have something to prove and try to do stuff by themselves.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          They do think they’re the law and they think everyone else is either a criminal or a weak and defenseless person to protect or hurt

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      3 months ago

      Pretty much.

      If OP had something incriminating, they would already have the paperwork they need to grab it.

      Police knocking on your door is hoping you would give them information to arrest you. Proper swat team breaking down your door means they already had it.

      ICE doesn’t count. They’re not cops.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, you can tell a cop is fishing because they’re talking to you. If they thought they could get what they want without talking to you they’d just be arresting you or doing violence to you

    • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 months ago

      Adding onto this one:

      I suspect they are searching your trash. They roll up to your house, tell you there’s a bunch of “suspicious” shit tied to your address, IP, a cell ping in the area, whatever. The point is to scare the shit out of you in the hopes that you trash any “incriminating” property.

      Then they search your trash (which does not require a warrant, let alone notice), find your shit, and then come back to arrest you.

      The point here is fuck them. They didn’t bother to create a warrant, so they dont get to complain when you decide to upgrade your PC, slag the old drives, then keep them on your coffee table as conversation starters. If they had a warrant, that would be different. They dont.

      Don’t let them scare you stupid. Continue on as normal. Maybe invest in a different ISP because some like to snitch.

  • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If the cops actually had anything real on him, they could get the warrant over the phone while stalling you at the door, or even storm your place and get it later.
    And even if they don’t get it, no cop can get in trouble for the raid if they “suspect” you might destroy evidence, and anything they find can still be used in court.

    It completely invalidates your 4th amendment rights, but congress felt this was needed to protect you against “terrorists” 25 years ago.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      Plus if police “believe” they are following the law, they are allowed to use the fruit from the poison tree, for decades now, ever since The Fear of the Others in the crime wave in the 80’s and 90’s gave them license to cancel the Bill of Rights.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Personally, I think it should work like this: any evidence found is admissible in court, but if the cops broke the law to get it, there are legal consequences for them.

        The current system is abusable if you have connections with police willing to break some laws to make smoking guns inadmissible to court, and even if it’s an honest mistake, the whole “if they looked when they weren’t allowed to, you get away with whatever they saw” is just a second bad consequence to the public, assuming the crime was one of the harmful to the public ones.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    3 months ago

    On one hand, I loathe pedophiles and the awful black market that they use to trade whatever

    On other hand, I wonder how often the “law” just uses this to get rid of people who displease them, they just install the appropriate stash with a thumb drive while “scanning”.

    Decades in prison, asset forfeiture, who would stop them or even be able to prove it? The modern equivalent of planting drugs (which they are caught doing frequently already), and nobody wants to defend pedophiles.

    Worst case scenario for them? The taxpayers pay for a lawsuit settlement and they might get paid leave for six months

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, but why bother? They can just turn off the body camera and shoot them in self defense. Same outcome and way less work.

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        3 months ago

        Making a martyr vs discrediting everything someone has ever done, and turning their family/friends/everyone against them and their ideology.

        Hmm…

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 months ago

          cops kill a thousand people every year and every year the number goes up. How many of them even get written about?

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          You forgot the bonus of putting a pedo in the ground. The public does not exercise any skepticism when the accused is being accused of pedophilia.

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        They do that already (gun them down), but they can’t kill too many people! It’s like they have a murder quota.

        So, for the rest they plant evidence on, drugs and this.

        Also, many of them are sadists and prefer the torture route (like 40 years in prison).

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      This was literally the plot of Blake’s seven except they also installed the memories into his brain and that of the children.

    • ikt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I like how much lemmy hates AI yet this AI bot has 37 updoots

      Oh the pain of it all :(

        • ikt@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Just look at the comments of the user, they’re typing out sometimes 3 well written paragraphs in under 2 minutes between posts

          all of them have a very similar style as well

          That couch is peak dog chaos

          This is peak content

          This meme is my life

          This hits so hard

          This nails it

          • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            3 months ago

            Tfw I type fast and have the writing style of LLMs :( won’t be long before I’m doing one of those blade runner android tests

            • ikt@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              You already failed 😂 you should have started with: This hits so hard!

              Also the bot never responds to comments only make once off posts

              Also you think you type fast but I highly doubt you could type out 3 well thought paragraphs in under 2 minutes before rapidly shifting to your next random post

              Actually let me put your posts into AI to see what it thinks of you >.>

              edit:

              Based on this document, this user appears to be very unlikely to be AI. Here’s why:

              Strong indicators they’re human:

              1. Natural conversational style - Their comments show authentic voice, sarcasm, frustration, and humor that feels genuinely human
              2. Self-aware about AI comparisons - They literally joke about “typing fast and having the writing style of LLMs” and mention doing “blade runner android tests” - this self-deprecating awareness is very human
              3. Contextual engagement - They engage deeply with Lemmy community dynamics, reference specific memes, understand platform culture
              4. Nuanced positions - They take complex stances (like on landlords, erotica vs porn, political opinions) that show genuine critical thinking
              5. Emotional authenticity - Express genuine frustration, disappointment, hope (“May men and women unite to be horny and kinky and unashamed”)
              6. Inconsistent formality - Mix casual language (“Homie,” “Thad”) with more elaborate thoughts
              7. Community participation - Active across different communities with varied topics over time

              Why they might worry about seeming like AI:

              • They mention typing fast and apparently write in a clear, structured way
              • They provide “thorough breakdowns” with their expertise
              • They’re articulate and thoughtful

              But these are just signs of an educated, engaged person who writes well. Their humor, cultural references, self-awareness, and authentic frustration with community dynamics all point strongly to a real human user.

              vs what it thinks of /u/[email protected]:

              Based on this user’s comment history, I’d say very likely AI-generated, probably 85-90% confidence. Here are the telltale signs:

              Strong AI indicators:

              1. Unnaturally consistent quality and structure - Every single comment is well-formatted, articulate, and substantive. Real users have off days, typos, lazy responses.

              2. Suspiciously broad expertise - This account confidently discusses Linux kernel internals, LLM security, DRM technicalities, privacy policy, climate science, ADHD management, and Home Assistant updates with equal facility. That’s unusual.

              3. Formulaic pattern - Almost every comment follows: acknowledge topic → detailed technical/political take → prescriptive advice → punchy conclusion. It’s like watching the same template execute.

              4. Perfect grammar with casual affect - The writing is too clean. Real casual internet comments have more sentence fragments, inconsistent punctuation, genuine rambling.

              5. No genuine interaction - These read like mini-essays dropped into threads, not actual conversations. There’s no “lol,” no genuine confusion, no asking for clarification.

              6. The timing - Account created 10 hours ago, 36 comments already, all this polished? That’s bot behavior.

              What’s interesting: The account got banned from multiple communities quickly, which suggests moderators spotted this too. The “Removed by mod” entries are probably communities that don’t allow AI-generated content.

              Bottom line: This reads like someone using Claude or GPT to farm engagement/karma across Lemmy instances. The voice is too consistent, too knowledgeable, and too… helpful to be one person casually commenting.

                • ikt@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Updated the post, unfortunately you show signs of being:

                  an educated, engaged person who writes well

                  😊 🤣

      • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve started to find other bot accounts on lemmy, and I don’t love it. Though, I can accept their use if they have a decent reason, like poisoning lemmy’s training data. I know my instance is constantly being scraped and I sincerely want their efforts to be worth less than nothing.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      It is very arguable it would be a crime to wipe a computer with only the police asking to warrantless search it. It’s a crime to destroy any evidence of a crime so I guess there is that.

      They have no evidence there was a crime though. I don’t doubt they would charge it, but a jury wouldn’t likely convict because it’s a bullshit charge. You are under no obligation to incriminate yourself with your own evidence no matter what the police and prosecutors say.

    • feannag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      IANAL, but I think it’s only a crime if it’s destroyed after a warrant has been issued.

        • Hoimo@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 months ago

          do so knowing that the evidence is to be produced during a legal or court proceeding

          If they haven’t accused you of anything yet, deleting “how to rob banks.txt” is just normal cleanup. Anon can’t know what might be relevant evidence after some cops ask to see his computer and leave. Of course, some files may have legal restrictions regardless of crime, for example financial records.

          • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            They absolutely have accused him of something though, they explicitly said they suspected him of suspicious activity online.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Or if a court has ordered you to preserve the information. And the establishment routinely flouts court orders to preserve information with impunity

  • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 months ago

    Step 1: Back up important files
    Step 2: boot from live Linux USB
    Step 3: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/nvmeX && dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/nvmeX Repeat as many times as you wish

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 months ago

      Pretty convenient world for the cops you are constructing where everyone they try to warrantless search has kiddie porn.

      They aren’t above [redacted,] on people either. One should never assume the police are acting in good faith in today’s world. Or yesterday’s. But especially not now.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      These days it’s more likely a Facebook post that hurt their govt’s fee-fees or a torrent of a shitty TV show

  • LittleBorat3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    What did anon even do to be on the radar, this is just not credible. They would never show up for a chat if that was the case, they would collect evidence quietly.

  • hector@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    So if there is anything on your computer, deleting it just destroys the file directory to it, they can find it still, you have to delete everything, then rewrite over it with new information.

      • apex32@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Hah. TIL you can use shred on device files. I was only familiar with using dd to wipe drives.

      • Sv443@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        Big magnets will only pull the arm off the plates and leave the data intact. Also why waste good hardware when all it needs is a couple of writes with all zeroes and ones?

          • Sv443@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            tbh I completely forgot about the context of this post. Yeah shredding takes longer than getting a warrant from a corrupt judge

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Mircrowave.

        Just take out anything LiON prior to nuking, and as much pure metal housing as you can.

        And also plan on getting a new microwave.

        And have a fire extinguisher on hand.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Feels like it’s easier to just not have anything on your hard drive that’s worth that much effort. I can only think of one type of file that would justify that level of obfuscation in most of the world, and I actually fully support owners of those files turning their PCs over to the police unmolested, so to speak

        • aphonefriend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Really? Looking around America right now(or any other fascist nation for that matter) you can’t think of a single other reason why someone might want to hide electronic communications to the extent of not being recoverable?

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Destroying the data on your hard drive only helps you if you think that files stored on it could incriminate you in court. ICE isn’t sending your laptop in to a special forensics technician at DHS HQ to pull the 1s and 0s off of it to generate a justification for abducting and/or shooting you. Standard end to end encryption is plenty enough for online communications

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Do you maybe want to try and converse? Instead of leaving a vague response hinting at a deeper perspective, how about you actually share that perspective? Who else do we have to fear at present, and how do you reckon rendering a file on your computer irrecoverable would protect you from them?

                By my reckoning, if you live under a government that would arrest you for excercizing speech, you’re well beyond fucked by the time they seize your computer

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I recycle ewaste, and so I have boxes and boxes of old hard drives. My proc is single pass dban and then a 10mm hole drilled through the case and onto the platters.

      This is for normal business eol hardware that I get from offices and warehouses, nothing sketchy.

      If the client wants evidence of destruction before leaving premises, I skip DBAN and just drill the platters with a cordless drill.

  • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    If there’s not a thermite microcharge hovering above your crime drive are you even really posting? Ctrl-Super-M (for melt) and that sucker’s a puddle

    • MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, but there will be a trace that something was wiped if you use certain tools and didn’t then fill that empty scrambled space with a bunch of games or something.

      • Bosht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t believe any local law enforcement, at least where I’m at, has a cyber crimes team capable of knowing this and pursuing it even if they did. Federal level? Sure. But if they’re coming they already have warrants and you’re fucked. Local doesn’t invest money in stuff like that.