cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agoJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1721arrow-down18
arrow-up1713arrow-down1imageJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareheavydust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up35·1 day agoBut it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
minus-squarepeoplebeproblems@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·1 day agoThat’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
minus-squareNatanael@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 day agoHow to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
minus-squaremaiskanzler@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-220 hours agoPeople could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 day agoWe don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.
But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
That’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
A codegrammar?
We don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.