I have setup so many instances over the months on different servers and the web ui always takes 40s to a minute to load per page I have always used redis for caching and the best methods even the aio docker image(s) are really slow.

kind of just been living with it for the past month or so but its really annoying when others are saying theirs takes seconds to load.

edit: totally didn’t forget to include a body

    • Human Crayon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I am with you as well. I’ve had my instance up for 3 years on 4 cores and 8GB ram and each page loads in seconds. I’m not running anything crazy on it either (stock + 3ish extras). Hard drives are 4x sas in raid10.

  • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve experienced the same, even the hosted/paid instances Nextcloud recommends are very slow.

    I think it’s just not built to be fast.

    • oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here,it tried running it on a vps, i tried it as the only program running on a 32GB ram operton server, now i’m running it inside Docker with Redis and all the recommended optimizations, no apps installed . As slow as always.

      Nextcloud is like Windows 98, when you install it it’s fast, then as you add data to it it gets expotentially slower.

      I’m moving most data to Syncthing, gave up on the Files part of Nextcloud.

      • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Syncthing is what I use as well, it’s very fast and I’ve been using it for over a year now with no issues.

        I’ve actually had nextcloud nuke my data once before too, they had a bug that reset the created/mod time of every file to something like 01/01/1000 and completely broke everything, I had to restore from a backup.

  • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What Hardware are you using? My nextcloud takes at most a couple seconds and has only been getting faster these last few updates.

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What database? I use Mariadb as a backend and have never had slowness like you describe. I guess also how many files?

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uhm, you will need to tell us more about your hardware or setup.

    I wouldn’t describe my Nextcloud as especially fast or optimized, but it is only around 20s from the login screen to being able to use it. And once you are logged in it is quite fast.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had that same issue until I disabled the collabora extension. It’s much, much better now.

  • johntash@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What kind of hardware are you using?

    Nextcloud does need some tuning by default, specifically the php, nginx/apache, and database settings so that they all make use of more resources and some stuff like cache headers or opcode caching.

    If you haven’t used it yet, I think the AIO installation of nextcloud includes a lot of config optimization by default. I don’t have experience with it, but probably worth a try?

    I’m pretty sure the database tuning is what made the biggest difference to me.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m using their apache docker and i don’t see many speed issues.

    I see issues instead with WordPress, my blog with 15000 pages but just 1000 visits a month takes 30 seconds to load a single page… Could not manage to improve it, even with extensive caching, percona, redis, and so on…

    One day I need to find the strength to migrate to Hugo (the automated tool makes a mess)

  • restlessyet@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you only want online file storage and sync, you may want to try Seafile. It’s a lot faster and has been rock solid since 10+ years for me. Not viable if you need some of the many nextcloud exentions though

    • VindianaJones@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have the same issues with Nextcloud as OP, regardless of the hardware it’s running on or what kind of optimizations I’ve done, but I’ve always hesitated to use Seafile because it doesn’t keep the files in tact. They are chunked/encrypted or something else, which I’m sure helps performance, but I really value having my files just be regular files with Nextcloud, so if I ever want to take them out of Nextcloud without the help of the application, I can just do that.

      I wish Seafile had an option to maintain the file integrity. If it did, I would definitely give it another try.

  • ShittyKopper [old]@lemmy.w.on-t.work
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because it’s ✨ modern ✨ and ✨ enterprise ✨

    Most new software not explicitly made for and by hobbyists will assume “just throw more hardware at it” to be a valid solution to inefficiency, and unfortunately Nextcloud (especially with any of the office extensions) seems to be heading that way.