• AA5B@lemmy.world
      17·
      1 month ago

      In any just world, there’s no such argument that the victims waived his rights because

      1. You can’t waive rights
      2. A unilaterally imposed term with no option should not.be construed as “agreement”
      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        11·
        1 month ago

        Yeah I think there’s a lot of people who aren’t getting this. It wasn’t an informed consent to danger form where the activity they knew was dangerous, and signed off on, killed them. This was a Terms of Service agreement you automatically agree to when you make a purchase. It’s supposed to govern the terms of using that purchase.