• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    In any just world, there’s no such argument that the victims waived his rights because

    1. You can’t waive rights
    2. A unilaterally imposed term with no option should not.be construed as “agreement”
    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah I think there’s a lot of people who aren’t getting this. It wasn’t an informed consent to danger form where the activity they knew was dangerous, and signed off on, killed them. This was a Terms of Service agreement you automatically agree to when you make a purchase. It’s supposed to govern the terms of using that purchase.