Are they editing the couchfucking pages?

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I almost watched this movie before I realized it was JD Vance’s.

    Appalachian History is super interesting and it’s actually got a good cast.

    But it’s based off his auto biography, so you can’t trust anything in the movie.

    • I'm back on my BS 🤪@lemmy.autism.place
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve heard mixed reviews. I have a buddy that’s from an Appalachian family. He liked the book, but said the movie was missing a lot of intimacy that is difficult to portray in film.

    • bquintb@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I read the book years ago and thought it was really good…I still do, and the movie was decent. I always wondered how much of it was actually true. But now I know the guy sold his character and integrity for Donald Trump and that tells you everything you need to know about him.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    His childhood in “Appalachia” that actually was a suburb between Cincinnati and Dayton.

    If he was actually from West Virginia, he’d know couches are for burning after a football game. (You can still fuck a burning couch but it’s the most dangerous game.)

    I’m from New Orleans I don’t even like to claim to be from the South — I’m from the Northernmost point in the Caribbean — and this motherfucker is claiming West Virginia heritage when he grew up basically equidistant from Chicago.

  • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Fuck JD Vance and his stupid piece of shit book

    From a quick glance at my résumé, you might think me an older, female version of Vance. I was born in Appalachia in the 1960s and grew up in the small city of Newark, Ohio. When I was 9, my parents divorced. My mom became a single mother of four, with only a high school education and little work experience. Life was tough; the five of us lived on $6,000 a year.

    Like Vance, I attended Ohio State University on scholarship, working nights and weekends. I graduated at the top of my class and, again like Vance, attended Yale Law School on a financial-need scholarship. Today, I represent people who’ve been fired illegally from their jobs. And now that I’m running for Congress in Northeast Ohio, I speak often with folks who are trying hard but not making much money.

    A self-described conservative, Vance largely concludes that his family and peers are trapped in poverty due to their own poor choices and negative attitudes. But I take great exception when he makes statements such as: “We spend our way into the poorhouse. We buy giant TVs and iPads. Our children wear nice clothes thanks to high-interest credit cards and payday loans. We purchase homes we don’t need, refinance them for more spending money, and declare bankruptcy. . . . Thrift is inimical to our being.”

    Who is this “we” of whom he speaks? Vance’s statements don’t describe the family in which I grew up, and they don’t describe the families I meet who are struggling to make it in America today. I know that my family lived on $6,000 per year because as children, we sat down with pen and paper to help find a way for us to live on that amount. My mom couldn’t even qualify for a credit card, much less live on credit. She bought our clothes at discount stores.

    Thrift was not inimical to our being; it was the very essence of our being.

    With lines like “We choose not to work when we should be looking for jobs,” Vance’s sweeping stereotypes are shark bait for conservative policymakers. They feed into the mythology that the undeserving poor make bad choices and are to blame for their own poverty, so taxpayer money should not be wasted on programs to help lift people out of poverty. Now these inaccurate and dangerous generalizations have been made required college reading.

    [Bolding added]

    e; fixed link (hopefully)