• TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    How do you rationalize knowing the outcome you’d be voting for, and then staying that course? I understand taking a stand, and wanting change, but voting in a way counter to any of that becoming a possibility doesn’t grok for me. Biden is 81 and is nearing the end of his time here on earth, so empowering the guy that is going to encourage more of the same abroad, and also open death camps for non-whites in the US isn’t going to signal anything to him or the party.

    • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I rationalize it by listening to Palestinians and their local advocacy groups. Nobody knows better than the victims.

      If they see one candidate as better than another, they’ll endorse.

      • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        So you think fascism is the answer? You would vote against minorities, in the US and around the world, to somehow save the people that are on the list of those the fascists plan to eliminate? You are voting for the leopard, and telling everyone to just deal with all the face eating? Weird stance, but if you can take a stance against everything you believe in, and believe that is somehow making things “better” more power to you I guess. You’ve drank your Kool-Aid and are just waiting for the meteor at this point.

        • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I think you’re confused, I’m not voting for someone who is carrying out a genocide.

          If you want me to vote for a certain candidate, you should convince that candidate to stop the genocide.