It opened in 1931 and underwent a major renovation in 1997. Apparently, the water usage is sustainable (see below), but it still doesn’t excuse the fact, in my mind, that continuing to support the upkeep of a green-ass golf course at the edge of Death Valley shows how out-of-whack its patrons are with the changing climate.

“In an area as hot and dry as Death Valley, balancing water usage with conservation requires significant planning. Furnace Creek and its namesake resort exist in their location because natural spring water flows from nearby mountain ranges to create an oasis. By routing the water from one point to others, the resort’s goal is to use the same molecules of water for several purposes. The spring-fed water is first used at the Inn to irrigate gardens and supply the swimming pool which was designed with a flow-through system that minimizes chemical use. That water then continues downhill to the Ranch where it fills the ponds on the golf course, providing habitat for local and migratory wildlife. The water in the ponds then irrigates the golf course.” - How Xanterra’s Furnace Creek Resort is Sustainable, greenlodgingnews.com

  • andyburke@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Guess everyone should just stay home until the whole world is bland and homogeneous but equitable.

    • Crowfiend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean people don’t have to just stay home to get close to a golf course that isn’t *literally siphoning the only source of sustainance for hundreds of miles."

      There’s a golf course down the street from me, on a main road to one of two local hospitals, surely you can find one within the nearest 10mi and if you can’t? You probably have bigger things to worry about than swinging a club at a 1inch sphere at your feet.

      If you’re visiting a country that doesn’t have enough grass to sustain pissing on a tree, you’re going to the wrong places for golf.

      • rockstarmode@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        If you’re visiting a country that doesn’t have enough grass to sustain pissing on a tree, you’re going to the wrong places for golf.

        I’m not sure I understand? Did you mean county?

        It sounds like this course is located at a natural oasis fed by a natural spring. If the course wasn’t there the water would probably feed some plant life and a bit of wildlife. With proper management it’s likely that their water use is more efficient than it would have been naturally. It isn’t unusual for resource aware golf courses to actually improve biodiversity in a region while being water consumption neutral.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yup, sure, it increases biodiversity by using foreign plants in a monoculture. That grass wasn’t there before, so it’s more diverse now you see?

    • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      So to be clear, unless you’re playing golf at the hottest location on earth, you must stay home? Solid reasoning.