• mommykink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    based on emotion and anecdote

    My argument is based on the fact that people’s opinion of the economy is more pessimistic than ever. This fact is/has been reinforced through almost every relevant poll of the past four years.

    Do you believe that these people are making up hardship? Or maybe it’s some sort of conspiracy against our Glorious Leader by those damn MAGAt scum? The reality is that people are actually suffering in a way that contradicts what studies are reporting to a near-unprecedented extent. That gap is unexplainable in any way other than concluding that the studies are fundamentally flawed and the charts showing how great things really are do not accurately reflect reality.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      the fact that people’s opinion of the economy is

      This is a fascinating little construction that I’m just gonna let speak for itself

      more pessimistic than ever

      Are you under the impression, also, that we should measure vaccine effectiveness by asking people whether they feel optimistic that their vaccine is working?

      There’s a fascinating little window into the flaws of this type of analysis, to be had in that the same people who report the nation’s economy doing badly, also report by quite a large margin the incorrect idea that their own state and their own family are doing much better than the nation as a whole. So they’re doing okay, but they’re still convinced that the nation as a whole is fucked and Biden’s definitely responsible.

      • mommykink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is a fascinating little construction that I’m just gonna let speak for itself

        Please don’t. I want to hear your real rebuttal here. “Official reports of the economy disagree with the polled sentiments of the majority of Americans” is an indisputable fact.

        Are you under the impression, also, that we should measure vaccine effectiveness by asking people whether they feel optimistic that their vaccine is working?

        False equivalency, but if every official body said that the vaccinated were much less likely than the unvaccinated to fall ill, yet every relevant poll showed that the vaccinated became ill at a rate similar to the unvaccinated or said that they or most people they knew were vaccinated yet had become ill, and that every person felt like their vaccines were ineffective, the sane thing to do would be to question the premise.

        Your last bit is a rebuttal for an argument that I’m not making; strawman.

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I can’t explain it any different way than what I already said in quite a few messages now. If you want to measure economic performance, then you should measure people’s wages, inflation, housing costs, and other concrete numbers.

          Asking people whether they feel like the economy is good is also relevant, for a few different reasons, sure. And you need to make sure you’re measuring the right metrics (e.g. wages at particular percentiles and not the stock market), sure. But you obviously shouldn’t let how people feel things are going, override the actual numbers of how things are going, when you’re talking about how to make economic progress.

          You can disagree with that if you like (and it seems like you do), but I don’t feel like going back and forth with you about it any further.