FKA
PP_BOY_/GIRL_
NotANaziIWasJustBornIn1988
NATO isn’t an army, it’s a defense pact. Member countries can’t just launch an attack against a non-member country (especially to “protect” said non-member).
I think it’s fair to say that ~80% of voters will just follow whatever their party’s media outlets say they should vote for. If a proper leftist and actually got the DNC nomination, I don’t think many classic liberals would think twice about voting for them.
If it were anything but a Toyota, I’d say to avoid the OEM premium, but I’d get it in this case. But not from a mechanic, either. You can almost certainly find then for a lower price and install yourself. Leaf springs are like 3 bolts
Imagine calling a a guy who owns a .com and another dude whose podcast is exclusive to the largest audio streaming service in the world “the dark web.”
If you don’t own a gun yet, buy one ASAP because it’s going to get a lot harder for people like you in the coming years
You would literally lose your job and social life in the US if you said this in America about immigrants lol
Go get your gun and brownshirt then Rambo
Use a DNS adblocker on your router and mobile network. 10x easier than it sounds. I haven’t seen an ad on my screen that I didn’t want in years.
You are not one of the good guys
deleted by creator
I remember when “analog horror” was when the VCR ate your rental tape
“Guns don’t kill people, people kill people” “the issue isn’t liberal globalism, the issue is unregulated markets.”
Of course no one is arguing on halting all international trade but the same brainrot idealogy that encourages maximum globalism also encourages finding the least-regulated and most profitable trade partners. Until the entire globe can adopt a different paradigm, you can’t reconcile those two components as not being inextricably linked. There’s no possible scenario where global liberal capitalism doesn’t produce unregulated, monopolistic, wealth-concentrating trade.
Most things shouldn’t. It just gives bad writing a crutch to stand on.
Bad thing happens.
Side A says bad thing is actually good and wants to continue bad thing.
Side B says bad thing is bad but actually wants to continue bad thing.
Debt, debt, debt, and debt. Most people don’t own anything in “their” home and probably never will.
Not to mention the fact that most of those (giant houses, trucks) are just people buying the only options on the market.
The economy isn’t dictated by some natural law and the metrics that we measure it’s state are completely arbitrary.
The economy exists only to improve the lives of the people who make it. If the people (overwhelmingly) say the economy is bad, then we already have the answer and need to work backwards from that. The fact that stock market reports say otherwise doesn’t address that fact anymore than “the sky is blue” counters “I’m hungry.”