The GOP candidate had said last week that states could secede if they felt the need to do so.

Nikki Haley, fresh off her Civil War history refresher on this week’s Saturday Night Live, appeared to remember what the Constitution allowed when it comes to state secession: nothing.

Haley again walked back her comments saying states could choose if they wanted to secede from the U.S., telling CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday that she didn’t believe the Constitution afforded them that right. It came days after she told radio host Charlamagne tha God that states like Texas could “make the decisions that their people want to make.”

“According to the Constitution, they can’t,” Haley told CNN. “What I think they have the right to do is have the power to protect themselves and do all that. Texas has talked about that for a long time. The Constitution doesn’t allow for that.”

The GOP presidential candidate then tried to pivot to why Texas would consider such an option, citing Gov. Greg Abbott’s frustration with the Biden administration’s handling of the Southern border and the state’s desire to protect itself.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Which amendment to the Constitution added since the 1860s has allowed states to secede?

    Because Article 10 was written before the 1860s.

    • shortwavesurfer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Exactly. Nowhere in the Constitution is secession mentioned. Therefore, Article 10 would apply since that is not given to the federal government. The only thing we have that says we can’t is Texas versus white. And that is quite dubious because of course the United States would pass a court judgment saying you can’t secede from the United States.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Again, there was a war fought over whether or not the states could secede. The ones that thought they could lost.

        I’m not sure why you need something more decisive than that.

        • shortwavesurfer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I would hope a war is not needed to settle such a dispute in modern times. If the states truly wish to leave peacefully, let them. The harder we hang on to this “union” the more devided and hateful we all become. Its time to let Bye-gones, be bye-gones. We tried and it is in the process of failing as we speak.

            • shortwavesurfer
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              Clearly it’s not settled because people still wanted. And we all know that the hardest thing to kill is an idea.

                • shortwavesurfer
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  What percent of people want to deny women the vote? I doubt it’s very high, where secession garners at least one fifth and possibly over a third. I have heard estimates ranging from 20% to over 40% with as high as 65% in specific areas. If the national average really is more between 20 and 40% you’re talking about 66 million to 132 million people. That is way bigger than a large enough pool to keep the idea alive.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    I have no idea why you think keeping an idea alive means that the idea is legal to do.

                    It could be 99% and it still was deemed to not be something that states could do between 1860 and 1865 and nothing has changed on that particular front since then.

                    May I remind you that your only legal case in favor of secession was a part of the constitution written decades before the 1860s?