The GOP candidate had said last week that states could secede if they felt the need to do so.
Nikki Haley, fresh off her Civil War history refresher on this week’s Saturday Night Live, appeared to remember what the Constitution allowed when it comes to state secession: nothing.
Haley again walked back her comments saying states could choose if they wanted to secede from the U.S., telling CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday that she didn’t believe the Constitution afforded them that right. It came days after she told radio host Charlamagne tha God that states like Texas could “make the decisions that their people want to make.”
“According to the Constitution, they can’t,” Haley told CNN. “What I think they have the right to do is have the power to protect themselves and do all that. Texas has talked about that for a long time. The Constitution doesn’t allow for that.”
The GOP presidential candidate then tried to pivot to why Texas would consider such an option, citing Gov. Greg Abbott’s frustration with the Biden administration’s handling of the Southern border and the state’s desire to protect itself.
Clearly it’s not settled because people still wanted. And we all know that the hardest thing to kill is an idea.
People still want to deny women the right to vote. That matter is still settled. As is the matter of secession.
What percent of people want to deny women the vote? I doubt it’s very high, where secession garners at least one fifth and possibly over a third. I have heard estimates ranging from 20% to over 40% with as high as 65% in specific areas. If the national average really is more between 20 and 40% you’re talking about 66 million to 132 million people. That is way bigger than a large enough pool to keep the idea alive.
I have no idea why you think keeping an idea alive means that the idea is legal to do.
It could be 99% and it still was deemed to not be something that states could do between 1860 and 1865 and nothing has changed on that particular front since then.
May I remind you that your only legal case in favor of secession was a part of the constitution written decades before the 1860s?
This is so absurd I don’t know what to think other than you’re a troll.