• 7 Posts
  • 506 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle
  • Those at the top of the inequality are probably very happy, but I was being a bit sarcastic. The vast majority in the middle and lower end are losing out badly.

    The inequality continues to widen.

    And now they are saying - shock horror! - that the satisfaction with democracy (or rather democratic institutions) is slipping.

    Vote in party A. Things get worse. Vote in party B. Things get worse. Let’s vote in party A again. Oops, things got worse. Well, let’s give party B a go. Nope - worse again.
    People: iT mUsT bE DeMoCrAcY tHaT’S tHe PrObLEm!!

    Conclusion: Inequality is eroding satisfaction of democracy!

    Did they allow for other factors that erode faith in politics/government? Like, idk, corrupt politicians? Kickbacks after leaving office? Blatant lying? Causing death, pain and destruction to thousands, a la Robodebt?

    I haven’t bothered to look at this ‘study’ but I can smell the ‘correlation does not mean causation’ from here.

    I think I’m a bit pissed off, because we’re spending money and time on ‘strengthening democracy’, when even their ‘conclusion’ says they should be spending it on closing the gap and reducing inequality.

















  • Interesting read. Couple of snippets:

    Labor’s legislation means that a democratically elected workplace delegate with no ties whatsoever to organized crime can now be legally and permanently forbidden from taking official part in any industrial negotiation.

    and…

    when the minister for employment and workplace relations is making decisions about the CFMEU administration, they are “not required to observe any requirements of the natural justice hearing rule.” Labor’s legislation also protects the CFMEU administrators from possible future civil action.