• hesh@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    You’re telling me the US, where Kentucky is, imports whiskey from fucking Britain?

    • Obituarykidney@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 days ago

      Bourbon has to be aged in “virgin oak” i.e. a brand new barrel to be classified as bourbon. Which is why it’s so dark in colour and part of why it’s so sweet. They sell the used barrels off after they’re done with them to get some money back on the now unusable (for them) barrel.

      Most Scotch is aged in ex bourbon barrels or ex sherry/port barrels. Using ex bourbon barrels gives the Scotch a lighter, more golden colour, and a more delicate flavour. Notes like vanilla, honey, caramel or florals.

      Ex sherry and port give Scotch a darker amber to a deep red colour with rich and sweet flavours like stewed fruits, spices like cinnamon or cloves and a stronger darker caramel.

      Most Scotch brand product lines will be like “ex bourbon barrel aged with: no age listed, 12 year old, 15 year old, 21 year old etc”. and then their other line will be the same again but in sherry barrels. They may also have a “sherry finish” where it’s aged for 10 years in bourbon then 2 in sherry, since the barrels impart less flavour the more they are used they can squeeze more out of the sherry barrels.

      Sherry barrels cost magnitudes more than bourbon barrels. I was told (like ten years ago so grain of salt on the figures) that bourbon barrels are around 50-100usd per barrel while sherry is close to £1000 per barrel. Hence why the tariffs would be screwing over the industry.

      /Rant

      Source: I was a whisky bar manager that hosted a ton of whisky events/tastings for a few years.

    • Baggins@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 days ago

      They import whisky. They export whiskey. There is a world of difference. And whisky (especially a quality single malt) is far superior.

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Well for scotch and Irish whisky, (wait thought scotch either added or removed the last e but I doubled checked something else and lost a message already, maybe it was a UK vs NA thing I dunno anymore)

      But apparently the scotch industry is the biggest buyer of Kentucky’s bourbon barrels. What do you know, random sweeping tariffs impact tiny industries that are big for the red states.

      Funny it took the King of Canada (well also Britain) to get Trump to change his mind.

      Mean actual kings know diplomacy and statecraft, I bet King Charles did it at best over Hors d’oeuvres to leave important issues for a proper time. That was probably a footnote in something to bring up. But pour a tiny bit of honey in his ear and Trump will dance like one of those symbol dancing monkeys. I think Iran is figuring out how to phrase their demands correctly.

      It’ll be like the chimpokomon episode of South Park, oh your penis so big! Then Trump will be fine with whatever they offer.

      • Obituarykidney@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        The whisky industry is like multi billions worldwide, it’s not a small industry. There’s definitely some lobbying going on here lol.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yes, because the US is where Kentucky is and they badly need something that isn’t ass water.