• Town@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    Do black holes evaporate trillions of trillions of times faster than expected? Supermassive ones were expected to take around 10^100 years.

        • Chakravanti
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          …_and_when they get large enough.

          Just like A big bang.

            • Chakravanti
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Finish the logic on that. Also, you’re wrong about size gravity wave generation. More=more

              • psud@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Consider supermassive black holes. They are the largest entities in the universe and they exist in nearly every galaxy. They aren’t going to get appreciably bigger, if they aren’t big enough to bang, what is?

                Then by what mechanism do you propose an incredibly deep gravity well could spit out bulk stuff?

                I’m taking the null hypothesis, you’re the one with a claim to prove

                • Chakravanti
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Ask Jack Harkness. I am not a science guy. I see dimensions that are at least difficult to describe. This one, not so much. “Eventually” gravity amps black holes super whatever clustefuck break the line of time to gravity.

                  Your super is little. Sure they act the way you say. Stars are sand. Super might be a mountain but we’re talking about black hole black holes here.

                  Does that make sense?