Consider supermassive black holes. They are the largest entities in the universe and they exist in nearly every galaxy. They aren’t going to get appreciably bigger, if they aren’t big enough to bang, what is?
Then by what mechanism do you propose an incredibly deep gravity well could spit out bulk stuff?
I’m taking the null hypothesis, you’re the one with a claim to prove
Ask Jack Harkness. I am not a science guy. I see dimensions that are at least difficult to describe. This one, not so much. “Eventually” gravity amps black holes super whatever clustefuck break the line of time to gravity.
Your super is little. Sure they act the way you say. Stars are sand. Super might be a mountain but we’re talking about black hole black holes here.
That’s small enough. They evaporate quicker the smaller they are
…_and_when they get large enough.
Just like A big bang.
I don’t think black holes can make big bangs
Finish the logic on that. Also, you’re wrong about size gravity wave generation. More=more
Consider supermassive black holes. They are the largest entities in the universe and they exist in nearly every galaxy. They aren’t going to get appreciably bigger, if they aren’t big enough to bang, what is?
Then by what mechanism do you propose an incredibly deep gravity well could spit out bulk stuff?
I’m taking the null hypothesis, you’re the one with a claim to prove
Ask Jack Harkness. I am not a science guy. I see dimensions that are at least difficult to describe. This one, not so much. “Eventually” gravity amps black holes super whatever clustefuck break the line of time to gravity.
Your super is little. Sure they act the way you say. Stars are sand. Super might be a mountain but we’re talking about black hole black holes here.
Does that make sense?
Coincidentally Universe Today addressed this in their recent question show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/live/SiGmJkeCPl8?t=59m51s just before the 60 minute mark
It makes sense that your reference is a science fiction show
That is not a reference. It is an allusion.