• metaltoilet@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 year ago

    “The choice is between two terrible people. One is actively trying to kill me and the other doesn’t care if I die.” --A old post I’m unable to find but truly sums up american politics.

  • 0110010001100010@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be fair, I didn’t want Biden the first time either. He just happened to be not Trump. I’ll vote Biden again, but I’m not pleased those are my only (real) options. We really need ranked choice voting here in the US…

      • Toxic_Tiger@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Such is the abject failure of most voting systems in use that if you vote for a candidate who has no chance of winning, you’re effectively making it easier for one of the two big candidates to win.

        It’s the same in the UK and I hate it.

  • TinyPizza@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s funny how we all forget that JB ran as a “place holder” candidate to begin with and said he had no desire or intention to run for a second term. The thought was that by now one of the other primary candidates (Klobachar, Harris and Buttigieg) would have gotten tapped and run on Biden’s behest. There was clearly a king maker deal cut so that they would all drop out and throw their support behind him to cut off Sanders momentum. They combined this with a media “bombshell” that Clyburn backed Biden over Sanders, after telegraphing support for Sanders previously. This combination of factors was snowballed into a media blitz that never let up and pushed Biden to the top seemingly by just repeating itself ad nauseam.

    Still though, the tap for the next in line never came and the old guard stays in place again just by merely having a pulse. Dems have once again squandered full control and couldn’t cobble together any protections from a clear and present danger in radicalized right political zealots. We could all argue about the spoilers and that we couldn’t re-do the filibuster but I’m sure a couple million could have been back channeled to make that happen. They didn’t want it to.

    At the knifes edge is exactly where they want us to be and they will take full fascism over even moderate movement toward actual implemented progressive policy. Now they will tell you up and down that they want things like student loan forgiveness or clean energy policy with teeth, but they will never implement it in a way that ensures it’s survival. It’s just platitudes that are built to fail and “vote for us harder and we’ll get it done next time.”

    I’m so tired of this political system where we’ve been held hostage for the better part of 2 decades. All the while our hopes for a meaningful America just slips further by and we’re powerless to stop it. The only option we’re presented is to press a pause button for 4 years so that we can have permission to feel ok until the election starts again in 2 years. I would take a rouge sentient AI resting control of the country and threatening our nuclear destruction, unless we do as were told, over this. At least then it would probably make at least some meaningful strides to correcting the course of our nihilistic self destruction.

    • StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Dems have once again squandered full control and couldn’t cobble together any protections from a clear and present danger in radicalized right political zealots.

      The mistake lies in thinking that they want to. One can believe they are bumbling fools who trip over their own feet for only so many generations before it becomes apparent that the agenda they somehow fail to foil over and over again is actually one that they wholeheartedly embrace themselves, too.

      • TinyPizza@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly I think it’s all the neo-liberal echos of Reagan. Something broke in the minds of Dem strategists and politicians when he so handily swept the entire country. For them it was a sign that the waters were rich if they could just wiggle a little more to the right economically and shake off the remaining vestigial support of Keynesian economics. Once both parties saw that you could feast on the corpse of America for decades without having to deliver anything outside of photo ops and being likable that was it.

        Maybe it’s all just that thing where people look back on George Bush and say they’d want to have a beer with him. It’s identity politics and we’re made to look through a prism at these people and see how our personalities would intertwine with theirs. I think we need to find a way to start trusting the boring and awkward candidates, or forcing our boring awkward friends to run for office. We need politicians who are visibly uncomfortable speaking at a podium.

        You’re right. The cereal can only be “Oops, all berries” so many times before you know that machine was built to only make berries and lie about it.

        • StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe. The Democrats had already spent decades helping to kill the labor movement, build up the carceral state, and rampage across the world in imperial war-making prior to Reagan. So while he may have been a catalyst for further open embrace of reactionary ideology (see: Clinton), I can’t quite buy that he was the absolute beginning of it.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not a fair assessment. The Democrats have not had a solid majority in both houses of Congress and the presidency at the same time in a long time. Other than the promises they make, there is very little evidence of what they would do if there wasn’t any Republican obstruction to stop them. They could very well do everything they say they’ll do, for all we know.

      As for Sanders, I’m not inclined to believe conspiracy theories about him. Look around you; this country is thoroughly right-wing. The vast majority of Americans are reflexively suspicious of avowed leftists like Sanders. He was never going to win the presidential primary, with or without shenanigans.

  • mrbubblesort@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t see how this is a particularly meaningful finding. Republicans hate Biden, and Democrats loathe Trump, so it’s unlikely ANYONE on either side would be hoping for a rematch.

  • AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Biden has done a better job than I expected, but he should clearly retire. I think this is a huge, and almost necessary opportunity for Democrats. Incumbents are way more likely to get reelected. Since Trump has pissed off too many people, and he’ll sabotage any other front runners for his party.

    Wouldn’t it make sense to get someone younger and a little bolder in now for the Dema? They have a very strong likelihood to win this round, and then they’ll be the incumbents next term. We could finally replace some garbage supreme court members.

    • detectivemittens@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. I don’t know why the Dems aren’t running someone younger…

      I wasn’t thrilled about Biden either, but I think Biden handled negotiations with Europe for Ukraine very well.

      But yeah, I get jealous every time I look at other countries’ leadership and see how young they are…

      • Holomew@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Statistically, an incumbent has a huge advantage right out of the gate. Not to mention Biden could splinter the vote which is the worst scenario for a party that holds the seat. I don’t like it either, but Bidens low drama, non-world-ending and still-not-trump platform is the dems safest bet.

        • Ertebolle@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’d be easier if he picked a less boring running mate; maybe he could lure in somebody who’d otherwise be inclined to wait for 2028 - Whitmer, say - with a secret promise to resign halfway through his term. (which I hope he plans to do anyway, though he obviously can’t publicize that fact)

        • detectivemittens@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree! To clarify, what I meant was that I was disappointed that Dems, including Biden, aren’t backing someone younger. Whatever happened to uplifting the next generation?

    • lunar_parking@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because Democrats love losing. This is literally something that has been seen time and time again. They make more money through fundraising when they’re in the minority. They care about nothing but capital.

  • tymon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Life is only getting worse for pretty much everyone, all the time, so yeah, that makes sense.

  • jerome@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just get rid of Trump, DeSantis, Marjorie, Ted, Boebert… all republicans and we’ll be fine.

  • Dandylion@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean seriously… We don’t have ANY better and more qualified candidates in our 331.9 million citizens? Really?

  • sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    The parties don’t care what people want/need. Occasionally putting the lipstick on the pig fools too many people for them to care.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, just look at the DNC and Bernie. Clearly chosen by the voters and not at all manipulated by the party to get the result they wanted.

          • lunar_parking@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do you have any idea how influential media is? When you have MSNBC and CNN plus various others talking about how Biden is the only viable option again and again and again, you can’t ignore the influence of that. He won South Carolina after the endorsement of a very popular and influential corporate Democrat there. The media along with the DNC saw that as the opportunity to rally around Biden. Everyone drops out and endorses him, and there you go. I’m oversimplifying a bit for the sake of brevity, obviously, but bottom line, Biden was chosen and supported to defeat Bernie because they couldn’t accept the possibility of a politician like Bernie winning. He was a threat to capital and he was extinguished from the race.

            • Deceptichum@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not to mention the DNC leaked information and ways to sabotage him (ex. Trying to use that he was Jewish against him$

          • Deceptichum@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They’ve literally fucking admitted to it and apologised, and you still eat the libshit propaganda that he lost fairly?

      • Sean@liberal.city
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        @hihusio @trashhalo @sin_free_for_00_days
        Trump saying that the election was stolen in 2020 (rehashing a lie from before 2016 election that if doesn’t win it is fraud)

        Big Lie: Hillary Clinton is assured to win. Next Big Lie: HRC lost only because of Russians, Susan Sarandon, and Bernie Sanders (ignore the 40 rallies he did to GOTV)

        Next Big Lie: Only moderate corporatists could beat Trump, Biden winning 5 states by a margin of victory of less than 100k votes must be ignored

          • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are leaders chosen exclusively according to the popular will of The People as you would seem to assert, or not?
            Are their extrapublic forces fingering the scales?

            You can’t imply voters are to blame for the parties ignoring their interests and admit other interests manipulate the system to serve their ends.

            • hihusio@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              primary voters vote for the candidate. party elites might have their horse but if the voters go another way, then their horse still loses the race despite the advantage. an outsider candidate could win if they have the votes.