• Birch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    If these guys did it right, and they haven’t, they have been right in that we also need to remove a shit ton of co2 from the atmosphere again and continue removing to compensate for unavoidable emissions, ALONGSIDE absolutely reducing and avoiding more emissions. But they fucked it up by becoming a bunch of greedy techbros that started selling shit they don’t have, are not producing, and know they will never be able to produce. It’s not just greenwashing, it’s downright fraud.

  • truthfultemporarily@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If we stop emitting greenhouse gases nothing will get better, it will just stop getting worse. We also have to remove all the GHG that we put into the atmosphere.

    • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 hours ago

      “Stop getting worse” is a pretty major improvement. And yes, trees work as carbon sequestration.

      Most (all?) CCS is not grabbing random carbon from the atmosphere. It’s pulling it out of smokestacks so you can keep burning fuel while claiming it’s green. It is not net negative even if working as intended.

    • Oddbin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Removing the GHG needs to be done but this is not how you do that. This is a way to say “look, we’re trying so just let us take another hit of that sweet sweet crude OK?”

      Plant trees. Simple.

      Let the systems balance themselves out. Simple. Not fun but Simple.

      CCS for industrial processes and that might one day be good enough to work on a global scale? Maybe but that’s fucking ages away and it’s certainly not this.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        There’s no amount of trees you can plant to actually put that genie back in the bottle in a reasonable timeframe. Consider how much highly concentrated plant matter we’ve dug up and then imagine how much we’d have to bury. We could spend centuries doing nothing but planting trees and cutting them down and burying them and still wouldn’t make up that deficit.

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Stopping it from getting worse is like half the work of controlling climate change, and restoring biodiversity is the way of removing GHG from the atmosphere, not silicon valley techno bro fans

    • alaphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Which - barring a sudden, rapid series of unprecedented technological advances in our ability to manage the chemical composition of our atmosphere - is the rough equivalent of saying, “unexplode this bomb”