• Oddbin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Removing the GHG needs to be done but this is not how you do that. This is a way to say “look, we’re trying so just let us take another hit of that sweet sweet crude OK?”

    Plant trees. Simple.

    Let the systems balance themselves out. Simple. Not fun but Simple.

    CCS for industrial processes and that might one day be good enough to work on a global scale? Maybe but that’s fucking ages away and it’s certainly not this.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      There’s no amount of trees you can plant to actually put that genie back in the bottle in a reasonable timeframe. Consider how much highly concentrated plant matter we’ve dug up and then imagine how much we’d have to bury. We could spend centuries doing nothing but planting trees and cutting them down and burying them and still wouldn’t make up that deficit.