• Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Just say “retard” if you’re gonna say it. Lazily censoring it seems worse, because implications.

    • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Right? I’m tired of the euphemism treadmill telling me what I can and can’t say. Especially if we are coming up with childish phrases like “unalived”

      I used to call myself a <transgender slur> until woke cispeople got on my case about it.

      Ahh… I guess it’s better than the old internet where the N-Word was your fast pass to being seen as funny and cool?

      • clang@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        This has always felt very doublespeak-y to me. Sort of like a control mechanism.

        I don’t know anyone “unhoused” who has ever been offended at the word “homeless”. It just seems silly to me.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I run into that shit with cripple.

        Fuck them, I’m the one on the fucking cane, I call myself what the fuck I want, and I will gladly fight about it.

        But, yeah, the edge lords will fuck things up

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I have a decent amount of patients that label could apply to and I don’t like seeing it used at all. Literally just a few weeks ago I was consoling a patient who was angrily crying because they perceived someone had used it to refer to them. I’m unsure if it was reality based; they do hallucinate and I didn’t personally witness it but its far from impossible and they were absolutely distraught. Using it pejoratively AND censoring it means you knew it was fucked up and did it anyway.