A clear majority of UK voters want the government to concentrate on rebuilding trade ties with the EU over forging a new economic deal with the US, according to research published this weekend.
The study, based on analysis of polling that used new methods of questioning participants, suggests people of voting age now see their economic interests, and the UK’s, as far more closely linked to open trade relations with our EU neighbours than any deals that Keir Starmer might or might not strike with the US.
The analysis shows how far the UK public has turned back in favour of the EU since the Brexit referendum, and it indicates the trend could be strengthened as a result of the economic turmoil unleashed by US president Donald Trump’s tariff announcements and resulting global financial panic over recent days.
Commissioned by the internationalist thinktank Best for Britain, the research found that 53% of voters now believe a closer relationship with the EU will have a positive effect on the UK economy, against just 13% who said the effect would be negative. In turn, 68% believed better relations with the EU would boost UK/EU trade in a clearly positive way.
Asked what they believed Keir Starmer’s priorities should be for a UK-EU summit in May, at which the prime minister and EU leaders will discuss moves to increase post-Brexit cooperation, the most popular answer was “trade between the UK and the EU”, which came out narrowly ahead of “illegal immigration across the channel” and, in third place, “improving the UK’s and EU’s defence and security”. Even among people who said they would consider voting for Reform UK at the next election, half (48%) said closer EU ties would have a positive impact on trade, with the same number saying it would make travel for Britons easier across Europe. This compares with one in 10 (11%) potential Reform voters who said it would have a negative impact on either.
Kim Darroch, former UK ambassador to the US, says ‘the US has shown little interest in doing favours for anyone, friend or foe’. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty Images
When voters were given 20 options and asked to choose four that the government should focus on improving, “the UK’s ability to sign new trade deals with the USA” came 17th. The cost of living came top, followed by immigration and asylum, the UK economy and economic growth, energy costs, UK defence, and trade between the UK and was EU in sixth place.
The study also found that a majority (62%) understand that the government is seeking a closer relationship with the EU. Far more people also thought the government was not going far enough to rebuild ties (35%) than those who thought the current approach was correct (15%). Among Labour’s winning coalition at the last election, a clear majority believed the government was not going far enough (54%).
A sample of 4,703 people responded to YouGov between 31 March and 2 April, just as Trump was beginning to unveil his tariff plans, which have panicked the global final financial markets and opened the prospect of a bitter and prolonged trade war between the world’s two biggest economies, the US and China.
Last week, Trump was forced by the meltdown on the financial markets to announce a 90-day pause in the introduction of his higher “reciprocal” tariffs imposed on dozens of countries – with the notable exception of China. Keir Starmer’s public line is that he still hopes to gain an exemption from the 10% base tariffs imposed on the UK by signing a wider UK/US economic deal in the coming weeks.
Recent independent economic analysis by Frontier Economics found that even in the face of Trump’s trade war, a commonsense deal with the EU that included deeper alignment on goods and services would secure economic growth of up to 1.5% to UK GDP, offsetting the impact of US tariffs completely for the UK and by a third for the EU.
Naomi Smith, chief executive of Best for Britain, says voters want Keir Starmer ‘to prioritise removing trade barriers in the interests of bringing costs down and getting growth’.
Naomi Smith, chief executive of Best for Britain, said: “Voters expect the prime minister to come away with more than just a defence pact when he hosts EU leaders in May and want him to prioritise removing trade barriers in the interests of bringing costs down and getting growth. They want trade before defence, trade before Channel crossings, and definitely trade with the EU before trade with Donald Trump.”
Much of the analysis was based on the “Max-Diff” method, which is regarded as suitable when a range of options need to be put to respondents in order to gain a full and meaningful set of responses. Under this methodology, priorities are scored by asking people to choose their top three preferred options and their bottom three to provide a representative result.
Peter Norris, chair of Virgin Group said: “As the last week has so painfully demonstrated, Trump is bad for business, consumers and savers. He has wreaked havoc in international markets and left us all on the precipice of a global recession that would mean real pain for people in the UK.
Gordon Brown calls for ‘economic coalition of the willing’ to tackle Trump tariffs
Read more
“It is of the utmost urgency that our UK government work with our reliable partners in the EU to remove the artificial trade barriers between us so that both British and European businesses are in the best position to succeed in these extremely challenging conditions and so shield consumers from the worst effects.”
Former British ambassador to the US Kim (now Lord) Darroch said: “Under the current administration at least, the US has shown little interest in doing favours for anyone, friend or foe.
“The global order which has been in place for almost 80 years is changing by the hour and it makes sense for the UK to find stability through deeper cooperation with our allies in Europe while maintaining good relations with Washington.”
Regrexit.
Brentry
Starmer’s such an embarrassment. While the rest of the world was telling Trump “no!”, he was there down by the dog bowl. Now he looks both naive and lacking in principle as trump has been pushed back effectively by everyone else.
As a start, sure…
Labour isn’t the party to do this. The longer we keep voting Labour and Conservative, the longer we’ll be outside of Europe.
If this is important to you, don’t vote Labour don’t vote Conservative and obviously don’t vote Reform. If this isn’t important for you then keep voting Labour.
I guess in the upcoming local elections you could vote for whoever you want, even if it’s a smaller party.
But I would say that in a general election, it makes sense to vote tactically. If you live in a constituency that is a tight race between Labour and the Tories, and your favourite party is the Lib Dems, but you prefer Labour to the Tories, then surely the sensible vote would be for Labour, since the Lib Dems don’t have a chance of winning that seat.
And this is how we stay out of the EU for a generation or three.
Imagine if we put all the effort of telling people to vote technically against the Tories into actually voting for parties that want to rejoin the EU?
How does allowing the Tories (who are almost entirely against joining the EU) to win a seat instead over Labour (who are terrified to being painted as wanting to rejoin, but who’s members and voters are strongly in favour) help us rejoin?
If you live in a seat where the LDs or Greens have a chance by all means vote for them, but for a very large number of seats the next winner will be one of the Tories or Labour and refusing to engage with that is equivalent to not bothering to turn up.
but for a very large number of seats the next winner will be one of the Tories or Labour
This is really upsetting though. The fact that Tory or Labour - both anti EU rejoining parties - are guaranteed a win. No. Nobody should be guaranteed a win. If we want to rejoin then organise enough people to overturn the assumption that Labour will always win. Tactical voting simply continues the trend of two anti EU parties remain in power. (Also the two parties that are, coincidentally, anti PR.). If we tell people in as many numbers to support a pro EU party as we tell people about tactical voting then I bet the electoral calculus would be a lot different.
If we tell people in as many numbers to coffee a pro EU party as we tell people about tactical voting then I bet the electoral calculus would be a lot different.
I honestly cant parse that sentence. For most people whether or not we join the EU is not the be all and end all of how they vote, and for large parts of England in particular +80% of the voters choose Labour or the Tories. In one of those places trying to persuade people that they should vote for a candidate who clearly doesnt have a chance based on your hobby horse issue isnt going to get very far.
Rather than that it would be far better to put your efforts into voting reform so that small parties with diffuse support actually get the representation they should. Which practically means pushing Labour towards accepting it, and trying to get parliament in a position where Labour need Lib Dem MPs to form a government.
Ahh typos sorry. My keyboard is shit and my fingers fat. Corrected.
If we support pro EU parties…
Fair point. I think ideally we should have proportional representation, and then there would be no need for tactical voting.
True true. But that’s another thing Labour isn’t in favour of. sigh
Because if FPTP was ditched they wouldn’t ever get “their turn” again.
Labour and the Tories are essentially the same at this point, and just taking turns to fill their pockets at our expense. Reform are just fascists in waiting, and make no mistake, are in it to line their pockets too.
We need more than electoral reform, we need a seismic shift in how politics works in the UK. The politicians need reminding who they work for. The taking turns pillaging the country from subsidised restaurants and hidden back offices in that ancient tinderbox in London needs to be stopped.
HoP needs razing. I’ll keep saying it until enough people realise I’m right. Those buildings embody the London-centric, entitled, self-absorbed attitude of our entire political system. They need to go.
Labour know they’re losing popularity, and they know that they only got in because of being the lesser of two evils.
If they dont want to hand over the next election to the Tory’s, they should reform the FPTP system and have a more direct democracy as one of their policies.
Unfortunate that this then means that reform and Tories could double up for later years to come
So the Lib Dems? Have they even stated in a manifesto that if they were in power they would have this as a goal.
Update: I’ve just had a look at their 2024 manifesto and they only mentioned brexit twice and it’s all in context of how the conservatives failed with brexit. There’s absolutely no mention whatsoever of rejoining the EU though.
Even in the most updated 2025 pseudo manifesto they only mention strong ties with Europe for military purposes because of Putin. Zero mention of trade other than the obvious recognition that Europe is a better trade partner than the US is right now.