I’ve been reading up on this FediPact stuff, and I’m curious: will the Divisions by zero instance be defederating Meta when they launch their new app that’s supposed to be Fediverse compatible? I checked the Anti-Meta FediPact list, but couldn’t find @db0 listed on there. I did read on a different post that the creator of the FediPact list has been blocking some people from signing it for whatever reason, so I’m not sure if that’s what happened here.

  • qprimed@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    and this hghlights one of the great powers of federation. instances and users can make consequential choices. we see it hapening already with the beehaw/lemmyworld/shitjustworks drama.

    honestly, I think people and the network will self organize and we will all end up with services that we don’t just tolerate, but actually enjoy using again.

    🤞

    • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the strength of the architecture really. Personally I hope dbzer0 flatly refuses any contact with a meta instance as this is my favourite implementation in the fediverse. As I see it we have nothing to gain by tolerating corpo presence, and everything to lose.

      As @[email protected] said: I’m just not interested in what anyone who still has a facebook account wants from an online platform. If you can put up with that much predatory behaviour and degredation of what was ostensibly a platform to connect with eachother and still keep using it, you’re a net drain on any system.

      I won’t be advertised to, I don’t want my data sold to the highest bidder and I’m not interested in having circular arguments with fools.