Image link from NSF forum.

Originally leaked on X (I think), then posted to the SpaceXLounge subreddit by u/mehelponow

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Yeah, the Spaceshuttle was a cautionary tale and the Ship doesn’t seem to have a fundamentally different approach. But lets see how things will develop.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Shuttle was aluminium beneath the thermal tiles, so damage to the tiles was catastrophic. The expectation is Starship will be okay with a few tiles out, partly because steel is much more capable than aluminium, and partly because they have backup thermal protection

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I don’t think the shuttle is a good example at all.

      The reusability was just marketing shtick so a large enough vehicle could be built to launch multiple Hubble-chassis Keyhole satellites for the NSA. (It’s probably more accurate to say the Hubble is built on a Keyhole satellite chassis).

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yet the technology it used for the heat shield was very similar to what SpaceX is trying to do with the Ship.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I’ve heard whispers that they are trying a new transpirational heat shield design since the tiles aren’t working out so well.