US Muslim leaders who supported Republican Donald Trump to protest against the Biden administration’s support for Israel’s war on Gaza and attacks on Lebanon have been deeply disappointed by his cabinet picks, they tell Reuters.

“Trump won because of us and we’re not happy with his Secretary of State pick and others,” says Rabiul Chowdhury, a Philadelphia investor who chaired the Abandon Harris campaign in Pennsylvania and co-founded Muslims for Trump. Muslim support for Trump helped him win Michigan and may have factored into other swing state wins, strategists believe.

  • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    There won’t be planes, or deportations. There will only be caged slave laborers in concentration camps owned by his friends, with the government (read taxpayers) paying the rent month after month, year after year.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Concentration camps might be a bit hyperbolic, but that was actually a fairly accurate description of how private prisons manage to make a profit.

        Except for a handful of states that passed legislation to prevent it, the 13th amendment makes an exception allowing involuntarily servitude as the punishment for committing crimes. If they manage to create a kangaroo court designed to be a revolving door of convictions for “illegal immigrants”, they absolutely could keep people effectively locked up as slaves for a while.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          7 days ago

          Concentration camps might be a bit hyperbolic

          It is not. Calling them “death camps” would be hyperbolic because Trump hasn’t started talking about a “final solution” (yet), but “concentration camp” is very much a factually-accurate synonym for the sorts of mass detention facilities necessary to implement deportations at the scale Trump has been proposing.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            7 days ago

            They are already scouting for sites for the “immigrant detention centers”.

            Suppose they achieve their objective. All that money being made? No way that system doesn’t want to swallow even more people, and not “just” immigrants.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            You are absolutely correct, but I was trying to avoid being inflammatory and giving an easy strawman when explaining why Trump’s concentration camps are within the realm of possibility.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          Concentration camps might be a bit hyperbolic

          …donvict and this thugs enter the chat…

          https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/incoming-trump-admin-is-eyeing-new-immigrant-detention-centers-near-major-u-s-cities/ar-AA1tYBRy

          Trump’s transition team is looking at how many migrants each region can hold, including in Democratic-controlled metropolitan areas across the country. A source familiar with the plans said they prioritize areas with large migrant populations that lack detention facilities, rather than single out Democratic strongholds.

          Cities with large populations of migrants — like Denver, Los Angeles, Miami and Chicago — could need additional detention sites built nearby to hold migrants arrested there. The administration might also need to reopen, expand or build new facilities in the Northeast to hold migrants arrested around New York City, Philadelphia and Washington, the source said.

          Another source familiar with the plans said so-called sanctuary policies in Democratic cities should not prevent ICE from expanding detention there.

          The details of the plan open a window into what Trump has promised will be the “largest deportation operation in American history.” Critics of the plan have said he would lack the money, staffing, willingness from countries to take back migrants, flights and detention space to make it a reality.