Summary

Historians suggest Democrats might have fared better against Donald Trump by embracing the economic issues championed by Senator Bernie Sanders, who has long pushed for a focus on “bread-and-butter” concerns for working-class voters.

Despite Kamala Harris’s progressive policies, polls showed Trump was favored on economic issues, particularly among working-class and Hispanic voters.

Historian Leah Wright Rigueur argued that Sanders’ messaging on economic struggles could be key for future Democratic strategies.

Sanders himself criticized the party for “abandoning” the working class, which he said has led to a loss of support across racial lines.

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Dems imbraced the race to the bottom instead of being a true opposition party. I voted for them this time around but never again unless they make a platform surrounding core left prencipals and left leadership. Many within my communities gave up on political means to help their communities and threw themselves into volunteering, activism, and self sustainability. You can’t demand bottomless support and obedience from your base while ignoring their cries for help.

    Dems said they are the party of science and facts but wouldn’t support universal health care or simply stop sending weapons to Isreal. If they were just as ravenous as republican are, can you honestly say we couldn’t achieve those good things?

    Dems said the Supreme court and justice system was courupt, but never even investigated the court or made cuts to the militarization of the police forces. Police are still killing people at the same rates with no real accountability. If the Supreme Court was left leaning Republicans would have expanded the court to make it right leaning.

    Just do what Republicans do to get there way but for good. I honestly can’t think of one dem policy that has been as impactful as some of the top Republican changes in the past 50 years.

    Ultimately we need to come together and demand better because if the dems don’t change it’ll be 50 more years of being steamrolled.

    • telllos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Honestly, your democratic party is very right wing to most of European. And you saying people give up on politics and turn to sctivism is so sad.

      If the government doesn’t take care of his poor, minorities, what are they doing.

      • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        40 minutes ago

        The government and the companies in the US work together as legal shields protecting the wealthy and money siphoning systems from the public to the wealthy.

        For example: Johnson&Johnson poison babies with asbestos in their talc baby powder. Instead of the Johnson family losing money or facing any consequences, the company and its employees bear the repercussions. The government investigates at its own pace and might be defunded in the areas relating to investigations. The government doesn’t guarantee health care so people don’t even know they have issues from asbestos because they can’t even go in to be diagnosed without significant cost. Accessing legal help for a class action can also be difficult. These large companies also have huge legal teams to defend them. And then the government also gives tax breaks to Johnson and Johnson, and nearly free publicly funded research from university research and students who not only paid to go to school, but don’t receive money for these student publications. And then J&J can take that research and profit off it.

        America is a giant work camp.

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If the government doesn’t take care of his poor, minorities, what are they doing.

        Facilitating the transfer of wealth to the richest fraction of the population.