Just send it to wallet to new wallet to new wallet a few times. Easy peazy and cheap even for people with only pennies.

Stop playing games and use it “by default” like how it’s intended and it even defeats the problems most apparent in “breaking monero” series.

How did you not figure this out already?

  • monerobull
    5·
    2 months ago

    Churning and sending to a different wallet you control leave basically the same on-chain footprint. Churning saves you the hassle of syncing multiple wallets though.

    • azalty@jlai.luEnglish
      3·
      2 months ago

      For real

      OP is literally churning, just to a different wallet if his.

      If transactions aren’t completely swept and they keep a non-zero change output, it makes things worse

      Churning is fine if you have coin control and keep note of your outputs

      Different wallets are fine if you manage to keep track of everything and properly sweep outputs. Avoid spending multiple churned outputs together if you can to prevent linking them together, but apart from that, it’s good.

    • WibbleWobbleEnglish
      2·
      2 months ago

      If you have a (mostly-offlne) “saving” wallet and a “spending” wallet is there an obsfucation advantage in transacting between them rather than just churning the spending wallet?

      • monerobull
        2·
        2 months ago

        Hm I believe it depends on if you combine outputs from both wallets by doing so but you’d have to talk to a decoy expert about that.