• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve literally never seen any person argue that forced arbitration is a good thing for consumers…

    It’s always corporations

    • moody@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s because the arbitrators are hired by the company. Unless it’s an egregious situation, who’s going to side against the people signing their paycheck?

    • Hannes@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I just saw the Uber case and realized that this in definitely way differently in the US. I was not aware that completely getting around the law was such a common practice. I thought that Disney thing was a rarity

    • Hannes@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      How often are you reading about someone suing and then that lawsuit (which is already in court) being dropped because they got a better offer for an arbitration/settlement out of court? For me that’s a very common thing to read for bigger cases.

      But I agree that forced arbitration with not even a chance to take it to court if you don’t like the offer is horrible for the consumer