• SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Are you arguing that the decision wasn’t made by the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court because they didn’t follow that state’s rules for eligibility?

              • blazera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                4 days ago

                Yes thats what we are currently discussing. They done the paperwork, they got the signatures.

                But uh oh democrats decided those signatures arent allowed, in a challenge brought upon by democrats to a democrat controlled supreme court.

                Just a reminder you are arguing against letting a political party participate in an election. The gravity of that is immense to me, i think it would be to you too if you were seeing it from an outside perspective. Like we see Russia banning candidates.

                • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  I thought this decision was made by the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court because they didn’t follow that state’s rules for eligibility.

                  Actually this is what I’m arguing.

                  It’s a couple comments up if you’d like to see yourself.

                  • blazera@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Yes they did. They jumped through all the hoops and got all the electors they needed.