• jerkface@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    you have to win votes from both sides.

    I don’t know what you mean by this. Progressives just need people to vote. The higher the voting turnout percentage, the better progressive candidates do. Conservative voters are the last people to stop voting due to disenfranchisement, they are practically immune to it. There are not a lot of swing voters.

    • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes, and the vast majority of Americans have no interest in voting for what they consider niche culture issues. Defeating fascists will protect everyone’s rights.

      • jerkface@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        You’re not saying that they are disinterested, that this is an ineffective way to spend energy or something. You’re saying that it will actively drive moderate Americans to hate trans people. I think you need to look into your heart.

        • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          So, to be clear, your claim is that I didn’t say what I literally said?

          Here, maybe an analogy will help. Suppose I run for office to fight corporate monopolies. How do I get people to vote for me?

          1. “My fellow Americans, a strong antitrust policy will save you money at the grocery store by preventing price gouging.”

          2. “My fellow Americans, a strong antitrust policy will save you money on Pokémon cards by preventing price gouging.”

          Even though Pokémon cards will be cheaper under a good antitrust policy, that’s not a fact that will motivate average Americans to vote. They don’t hate Pokémon, you understand. They just have their own problems, living paycheck to paycheck, etc.

          Hope that helps!

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, they’re saying that it will actively drive some moderate Americans to not vote because they see the trans question as being a far left issue. If they have more votes to lose than to win by talking about trans rights (which trans actually know are better protected by Democrats) then why would they talk about it when their goal is to be elected?

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is a reasonable response. But generally “energizing the base” is done closer to the election. We’ll see more preaching to the choir discourse around then.

      • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m kind of hoping the silence on Gaza turns loud once the election is close enough that AIPAC money won’t fuck the election.

        • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I honestly don’t give a shit how loud they are about it before the election, I just want to see them take action once Kamala is in office.

          Right now I just want to see them win the election, because everything else I want is off-the-table otherwise. If being quiet on controversial issues right now helps, then they should do that.

          • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Right, but turning vocal on it right before the election might get some more people to actually vote, and higher turnout means Dems win.

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Like how Biden has been taking action on it while he’s been in office…?

            There’s zero evidence Harris will do anything she hasn’t voiced support for once she’s in office, and she has no actual motivation to do so once the election is over.

            “We just need to win” is literally just that.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              And the only time when Biden has seemed to briefly change tact on Israel was when his polling for the upcoming election was suffering. All this philosophy about “don’t make a stink now, it’s only going to get Trump elected” is bullshit, because it very much also might make Democrats decide trans-rights/Palestine actually matter. Quietly storing it away for after the election will do absolutely nothing.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                All this philosophy about “don’t make a stink now, it’s only going to get Trump elected” is bullshit, because it very much also might make Democrats decide trans-rights/Palestine actually matter.

                That’s the only reason centrists don’t want anyone making a fuss about it.