• anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    How would RFMA “throw LGBTQ+ and interracial marriages back under the bus”?

    For those not already married their rights could be denied by a simple county clerk that doesn’t believe in gay or interracial marriage.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      For those not already married their rights could be denied by a simple county clerk that doesn’t believe in gay or interracial marriage.

      That would absolutely suck, sure, but I’m not sure what they could do about that. Marriage licenses are state-issued and it’s a power not given to the Federal government. RFMA demands states accept marriage licenses from other states (as the full faith and credit clause allows them to demand) and repealed DOMA, which prevented the Federal government from recognizing gay marriage (in the event of Obergefell being overturned). Those are important, even if it may fall short of perfection. And for that reason the bill was largely touted as a win for progressives.

      Short of a constitutional amendment, which will NOT happen in our current national climate, there’s not much more the federal government can do I think. I’m not a constitutional scholar.

      Considering every single Democrat in Congress voted for RFMA, I think holding Harris’s support for the bill against her is quite silly.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        I got way more against Harris than just a single bill. Her history against the broad spectrum of the marginalized is horrific