• aasatru@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I have to admit I’m beginning to lose faith in a two-state solution. Part of me is beginning to think an international protectorate with only limited self-governance in a single Palestinian-Israeli state would be the only acceptable way out of this mess.

    There has been shorter moments of calm, but Palestine has been fought over since pretty much forever. Samson’s fighting the Philistines over it already in the old testament. Nothing got better when the Christians started getting involved with their fucking crusades.

    Maybe the only way we’ll manage to put an end to it is by global warming rendering the region uninhabitable. Hopefully a few bedouins will still manage to get by in the desert. They’re hardier than most.

    • Drop Bear@theblower.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      There is no path to lasting peace that includes a Zionist state @aasatru

      Zionists like to use ancient history for distractions
      but I draw a line at the Ottoman Empire. That was a prolonged period of stability, in which Muslims, Christians and Jews shared Palestine.

      Then came the British. The story really begins around the year 1840. Apparently, they were quite miffed that Britain’s Jews weren’t interested in moving to Palestine.

      This is long, but worth a read. It reveals some interesting history.
      https://www.versobooks.com/en-gb/blogs/news/the-destruction-of-palestine-is-the-destruction-of-the-earth
      #Palestine
      #Israel
      #colonialism
      #impirialism

      • aasatru@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Obviously an international protectorate would be incompatible with a zionist state. It might be more of a no state solution than a one state solution.

        A tricky part of zionism might be that, except for the fact that it’s an inherently evil contemporary ideology, a longing for Zion is somewhat inherit in Judaism. If a version of zionism is to be salvaged I think it requires a rethinking of what Zion is - peaceful coexistence during the Ottoman Empire might be as close as one could ever get to its meaning in a religious sense.

        As it appears today, zionism is a longing for a pure state of a single people, based on romanticized ideas of a hypothetical past that we know literally nothing about. That’s pretty much exactly the same as any other totalitarian ideology.

        I do, however, believe that we have to accept that ancient history matters. Not necessarily because it actually does, but because it creates powerful narratives that are incredibly hard to fight.

        • Drop Bear@theblower.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          @aasatru
          I’ve read that Jewish Zionism takes many forms. Among them, that Zion is wherever Jews are.

          Complicating that is that Jewish Zionism springs from Christian Zionism. That’s a Protestant reinterpretation of scripture dating from the turn of the 17th century.

          Jews didn’t start using the term ‘Zionism’ in relation to themselves until the late 19th century. Herzl adopted (or perhaps developed) the Jewish master race interpretation. Other groups evidently took different paths.

          Originally, Palestine wasn’t part of the plan. Locations around the world were considered. Somebody (probably Herzl) realised that they could leverage the historical connection to Palestine. It also plays into the Christian rapture/second coming narrative, which was significant in the British involvement. The image is from the link that I posted earlier.
          #Palestine
          #Israel
          #colonialism
          #imperialism