• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 个月前

      Is there a “predominantly white” flavor of cigarette? Can you explain how you would take steps to ban cigarettes, without “targeting minorities” and without an immediate outright ban?

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 个月前

        I wouldn’t take steps to ban cigarettes. Prohibition never stops people from doing what they want to do, usually makes things worse, and usually disproportionally affects minorities.

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 个月前

            Stay the course. Smoking is trending down. Continue educational programs so everyone knows the risks, but ultimately leave it up to adults to make their own decisions.

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 个月前

          And yet, overall. Smoking reduction efforts in the US have been pretty effective.

                • ripcord@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 个月前

                  Well, since this isn’t proposing “banning cigarettes”, and nothing in the parent comments was about banning them outright (in fact the opposite was the point), then it made no sense that you would be asking about that.

                  I thought you meant banning SOME cigarettes (or ban smoking in some cases) which would have been way more relevant.

                  But there are many kinds of cigarettes that are banned (and this would be another one), and many scenarios where smoking is banned. Those sorts of things have been part of why smoking has dropped significantly, without outright banning.

                  Hence, you know, the context of the things you were replying to here.