Congress is trying to push through a swarm of harmful internet bills that would severely impact human rights, expand surveillance, and enable censorship on the internet. On July 20, we’re launching a week of action to get loud about our opposition to legislation like KOSA and EARN IT and demanding that Congress focus on passing badly needed comprehensive privacy legislation to actually protect us from the harms of big tech companies and data brokers, instead of pushing through misguided legislation before August congressional recess.

  • tusker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    If they cared about privacy they would pass a bill requiring all websites to have an I2P mirror.

    It is all about protecting the power monopoly of the banking mafia, the state is just the tool the banks use to keep their position secure.

    • monerobullM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      requiring all websites to have an I2P mirror

      That would be so cool.

    • SakiOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Don’t forget about the proposed Client-Side-Scanning in EU too!

        • Blake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Canada has an ‘Online Harms’ bill, just like the UK (same name, kinda sus). Promises to be extra draconian.

          "… platforms would have to inspect all content — including images posted and remarks made by anyone, domestic or foreign, including Canadian citizens, residents, refugees, and foreign students; confidential and privileged communications between lawyers and clients, and between physicians, psychiatrists and other healthcare professionals and their patients; journalists, academics and anyone else — to judge if it crosses an as-yet undefined ‘hurtful’ threshold or falls into any of the five targeted categories.

          Accomplishing that would require encryption be broken …"

          Signed: A Luddite

          • Cruxifux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Thank you, I was hoping you’d explain what the Canadian equivalent was for me. I had no faith in my government NOT trying to be skeezy about it, but I didn’t want to look it up.

            You’re the real MVP and I appreciate you bro.