• freagle@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    What could you possibly be implying? I have no idea what you could possibly think would happen if the USA just stopped dominating Japan.

    • FellowArmadello
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you don’t know what I’m implying, look at what Japan did before the USA joined ww2

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Are you implying that there’s something inherent in Japanese people that would cause them to revert back to committing atrocities and that the only thing stopping them is the USA dominating them while the USA commits atrocities? Of course that would also be coupled with the belief that the atrocities the USA commits are not inherent in the American people, right?

        • FellowArmadello
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s nothing against the people of Japan, but their geography. They need to import their oil and lots of other stuff, so if they didn’t have major global allies and markets, the country would need to lash out.
          Obviously the first question you asked is loaded, so I won’t answer it. Any atrocities committed by American actions are obviously bad, but you’d have to be more specific about what atrocities for me to answer.

          • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            So Japan is a risk because of resource scarcity? Someone really needs to get on dominating Europe.