If @mastodon becomes thread-like, I’ll leave social network forever. I’m done with meta wanting to control everything, chiefly the freedom of speech in a network used to communicate. I mean, really? The upsidedown World.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You can’t block Threads users or comments with the Lemmy instance block function, which basically makes the lemmy instance block function practically useless.

      • abobla@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Interesting, maybe this can be suggested as a future update for lemmy

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It was suggested long ago. This useless bs is what we got instead.

      • Blastboom Strice@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Question:

        Is it possible that this happens because your instance has already defederated from threads?

        My instance (mander.xyz) has defederated from them and I too can’t block threads. (Fun fact: mander has only defederated from 2 instances, threads.net and burggit.moe)

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I think you misunderstand: lemmy’s new instance blocking feature that users can use only blocks posts from an instance, not users or their comments from that instance, which is what most people wanted the feature to do: block the toxic jerks from any particular instance along with their posts, comments, etc the same way defederation would. By only blocking their posts but allowing their comments, etc. to come through, the new feature is mostly useless, as it still requires users to be blocked individually.

          Since Threads is an instance that has, rather than thousands or tens of thousands of users like a typical lemmy instance, but tens of millions, this makes things even more daunting for users of instances which don’t defederate from Threads.

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          For countless thousands or millions of individual accounts? Are you joking?

          Instance blocking, should block the entire instance, users and all. Not just its posts. 

          • Wodge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            If your stance is to stop any interactions with people who use Meta products, then you probably need to stop using the internet.

      • abobla@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I don’t know how to do iton mastodon, but I know it’s possible on lemmy 0.19 (lemmy.world, lemmy.ml, lemm.ee and others have this version).

        I’ve never blocked an instance though.

        edit: grammar

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    There are better arguments for not federating with Meta’s Threads, some of which can be found in [email protected]. Firstly, Threads isn’t going to be able to restrict speech on other instances, at least not in any direct fashion. And secondly and more importantly, an argument for “freedom of speech” without qualifications is either naive or disingenuous: Paradox of tolerance

  • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Here’s a question, forgive my ignorance. Is there a way to determine ownership of an instance beyond the name of the user account that owns it?

    What if meta used their massive amounts of data storage to flood the fediverse with meta-owned instances, making it difficult or impossible to determine what they control and what they do not?

        • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh, it is good news. I wanted a source, so I can embrace in the excitement. I want Meta to fail, and anything that contributes towards it is great in my book. I just want to know it’s actually happening and see it in the data!

            • Dame @lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’ll wait for you to read it again. You said there’s less users than that uses Mastodon and that’s not even true. You clearly skimmed passed that part, then commented in odd fashion. When it’s too that failed as you provided false information. Even if you don’t use the article I provided find a recent source that’s not from the summer. Even then at its lowest the numbers was still higher than Mastodon which has 1.6 m MAU

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    How would meta control your speech on a platform they don’t run?

    Oh no, your posts might not be visible to people using Threads!

    As a side note, I don’t think Mastodon posts should show up on lemmy at all.