Hello! I’m trying to ping some lemmy instances to understand which one is the faster, so I’m just using the ping command:

$ ping lemmy.ml
PING lemmy.ml (54.36.178.108) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from lemmy.ml (54.36.178.108): icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=24.4 ms

ping lemmy.world
PING lemmy.world (135.181.143.230) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from static.230.143.181.135.clients.your-server.de (135.181.143.230): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=58.2 ms

but if I try with certain instances:

ping vlemmy.net
PING vlemmy.net (109.78.160.70) 56(84) bytes of data.




it just hangs there, forever. if I try to ctrl+C it, it displays

^C
--- vlemmy.net ping statistics ---
13 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 12267ms

why does this happens? I can perfectly visit vlemmy.net from my browser so I really can’t understand whay is this happening

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        ICMP is one vector of a distributed denial of service attack. Also, even if not denying the service, it puts load on the network interfaces / routers of that server - everything behind the first firewall / router layer that would otherwise block the ICMP requests.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Adding to the other answers, there isa bunch of server software that comes preconfigured to ignore ICMP.

  • qprimed@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    ICMP echo requests/responses may be blocked - usually by a remote endpoint firewall.

  • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The server’s firewall could be blocking them?

    If it’s a VPS, most providers’ firewalls will block everything by default, and you have to specifically choose what ports to open or transmission protocols to allow.

    I personally have all my VPS’s set up to drop pings from any unauthorised IP addresses

  • Max_Power@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ping nowadays is overrated anyway. If a server responds to ICMP and how fast it does it does not really say much about “how fast” a website is. It only tells you that a) ICMP requests and responses are not blocked and b) how fast ICMP requests get answered.

    That’s it. It may not even tell you that a website is online because a load balancer may be responding to the ICMP request while the hosts behind it are offline.

    People value ping responses way too highly.

    httping may be a better tool to measure “how fast” a website is responding.

    • tubbadu@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      httping may be a better tool to measure “how fast” a website is responding.

      this works well, thank you! the results are similar to the ones obtained with ping, but vlemmy.net and other instances that ping couldn’t reach are correctly measured. seems that lemm.ee is the fastest for me

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      People value ping responses way too highly.

      I beg to differ. Not everyone’s use of the internet is limited to http(s) - ping is an invaluable tool to determine round trip times of the underlying network infrastructure & therefore assess e.g. the potential throughput of TCP based protocols for given window sizes. Also, to assess delay in UDP based communication.

    • Sebito@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also every major browser has a tool for timing and seing how long a site and it’s components load. You could test it with that but even then; load times will vary slightly depending on what the instances have to load.

      But probably a better way than pings ¯_(ツ)_/¯