• @monerobull
    link
    English
    1211 months ago

    Because it’s slower than using VPN + clearnet?

    • Mubelotix
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      Do be honest I don’t care about speed when it’s free. I just start the download and enjoy it a few days later

      • @monerobull
        link
        English
        1211 months ago

        The selection of torrents on i2p is also a lot smaller than on the clearweb.

        • Mubelotix
          link
          fedilink
          English
          511 months ago

          I might work on this later. I’m a developer specialized in p2p technologies. I’m currently working on a decentralized search engine for ipfs but after that I would like to build a torrent client that supports clearnet and i2p at the same time, and also supports decentralized search of torrents

            • Mubelotix
              link
              fedilink
              English
              111 months ago

              Thanks I will look into that. I’m not sure yet if that’s exactly what I want, I don’t only want the client to support downloading from multiple networks, I also want the client to provide the torrent on all available networks, working as a bridge between them

              • JacketedSpud
                link
                fedilink
                5
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                The qBittorrent 4.6.0 alpha/beta adds support for i2p torrents. There is also a checkbox to enable “Mixed Mode” where the torrent will download through i2p and the clearnet at the same time. Sounds similar to what you are describing.

              • @CAVOK@lemmy.worldOPM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                311 months ago

                Something that’s missing from i2p is emule or similar. We had muwire but that got discontinued.

                If you’re up for it.

          • @monerobull
            link
            English
            311 months ago

            As a user: There needs to be absolute certainty that clearnet is disabled when I want it to and no way to leak the IP. Kinda like how i know setting mullvad as the internet adapter should mean client traffic only ever goes over that connection.

        • @CAVOK@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          511 months ago

          You don’t have to. You can audit the code yourself and build it from scratch. Most won’t. But you can.

            • @CAVOK@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              511 months ago

              True, but you can. For vpn you have to trust them. There is no other choice.

              If you can’t read code yourself you can pay a number of companies some money to do the audit for you. Or you can learn to code.

              You can’t learn to know how the vpn logs data.

              But I get you. Most of us just put our trust in another entity.

        • @alvvayson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          09 months ago

          The trust model is totally different.

          With a VPN you know the VPN dudes can compromise your security and you have to trust the specific guys hosting your VPN and also trust their OpSec. The failure mode is quite realistic.

          With I2P, and Tor you can trust that anyone in the world can audit the code. Including the highly knowledgeable people who know this stuff.

          The failure mode is very low and in reality depends on highly complex zero day vulnerabilities that can only be effectively exploited by a few nation-states, if they actually even have one.

          That said, a VPN is lower hassle and probably good enough for most purposes.