considering the current state of the world and things like the resurgence of fascism and other authoritarian ideologies, do you think there is still a chance to avoid a new world war or now is unavoidable?

  • mister_monster
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    20 days ago

    The term “world war” is a propaganda term. First, the only reason the world was involved was because the world was mostly colonies of the belligerents. In reality it was a European war, and European holdings were involved due to their economics.

    In the second one, there were 2 distinct wars where the belligerents were allied for strategic reasons. The US was at war with Japan and Europe was at war.

    Since the end, peace has been held with a bunch of strategic alliances, so in any real war, all countries take sides. But with the current 2 notable wars going on, it appears that that alliance structure is breaking down. Alliances are not in line with the economic realities of these countries. The more real things get the less these alliances will hold. This is probably a good thing, as it prevents everything from getting out of hand.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      The term “world war” is a propaganda term

      Why is it propaganda and not just a misnomer?

      • mister_monster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        20 days ago

        Because it was deliberately designed to instill a certain sense about history.

        • Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Yes and totally had nothing to do with the fact the belligerents were on all continents except Antartica. Total propaganda with no basis in accuracy whatsoever.