misbehavior will continue until material conditions improve
I don’t know how reputable they are, but these two video from their youtube caught my attention:
How Economists Invented Austerity & Paved the Way to Fascism
Development, Climate Change & Capitalism
They’re both very critical of capitalism, perhaps even explicitly Marxist, as in the second video Ying Chen refers to her paper How Has Ecological Imperialism Persisted? A Marxian Critique of the Western Climate Consensus.
He’s not pro-Russia, he’s anti war.
JT is trying his best bro
deleted by creator
Does your country’s QOL not come at anyone’s expense, disproportionately? The Global South’s for instance?
I’m sorry. I meant to agree.
Failing to acknowledge that authoritative measures arise not through ideology, but through material conditions, is anti-Marxist, anti-dialectical, and idealist.
“Tankies” need to articulate themselves better, and stop fighting in the mud with the propagandized.
deleted by creator
Why aren’t posts on mastodon called “toots”?
I’m going to post it on some communities. Thank you for getting the word out.
It tells me I’ve downloaded a bunch of stuff i haven’t, and none of the stuff I have.
Coming and going, but where am I?
I want a cafe to go, with grass carpet.
It’s near the same but the important distinction is that your user doesnt accrue or lose points. Just comments and posts have a score, not your profile. This should disincentivize karma whoring.
I pompous. You pompous. He, she, we… pompous. Pompology the practice of flatulence auto-olfaction? It’s first grade lemmy!
Also, some hypotheticals don’t consider the inherent problem of a situation or ignores context, and therefor aren’t worth entertaining. Not all, just some. When that happens it’s best to explain why the hypothetical doesn’t work, which I suppose is entertaining it.
Rewatching them, they’re both explicitly marxist.