Instead of click Not Interested, I recommend igoring them. It might take a few days or even a week, but I they should start to disappear from your feed
Is that conceptually asinine? Absolutely… But it’s your best bet
Instead of click Not Interested, I recommend igoring them. It might take a few days or even a week, but I they should start to disappear from your feed
Is that conceptually asinine? Absolutely… But it’s your best bet
Personally I don’t think we should’ve been supplying them in the first place for the simple fact that they’re more than suitably equipped already
I just think that if the goal is a ceasefire, neither continuing nor halting supplies would really move the needle. Want us to stop supplying them? Fine by me.
Yeah, we could cut off every possible kind of funding to Israel and they’d still have sufficient military resources to level Gaza a hundred times over
Only engage with things you want to see more of. Downvoting and Not Interested are both forms of engagement.
Engagement metrics allow YouTube to show advertisers that you’re actually looking at the page and not just letting it run in the background
That section of the TOS was removed in 2023
I think they might mean they wish Apple would support RCS in general (which Apple has been refusing to do)
How old are the blank DVDs? Consumer-writable DVDs degrade over time
Spez has never had the gift of foresight. Reddit was Paul Graham’s idea after he shot down the idea that Huffman and Ohanian pitched
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/09/how-steve-huffman-and-alexis-ohanian-built-reddit
You explicitly invited content that would be difficult to discern from illegal, underage nsfw content
And that was a problem–Yeah, no shit
To borrow from a comment about kbin: “Making that work requires more mods than a Bethesda game”
I genuinely appreciate that you wanted and attempted to run an instance that would be largely nonjudgmental on content, but, damn, you really shouldn’t be surprised that inviting “loli” content would be (at the very least) an enormous challenge for moderation
You’ll still know what the numbers at the end mean
“Though Intel does promise to keep the generation of a chip noted in the codename, i.e. ‘Core 9 15900K’.” [1]
Headline is a typo; it’s “chyron”
Are you referring to 14A arguments outside of sec. 3? I ask because section 3 has only been applied to one non-confederate
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2021/01/11/14th-amendment-trump-insurrection-impeachment/