Alpha scientist on an SUV: just push it out
Alpha scientist on an SUV: just push it out
Economics: How much are you willing to pay?
Smarter you in a few years ;)
I’m with you on that. My comment was more like sometimes the appendices seem to get out of hand. They probably contain entire papers there.
No need to rush to conclusions, I do read appendices when needed. My point is not that authors should cut the appendices or compromise on any other good open science practices. The point is that disproportionately large appendices make one wonder if some of that stuff actually belongs in the main text. If it is just a robustness check that gives a similar result, fine, make a footnote in the main text and put the analysis in the appendix. But what if it is actually relevant information that changes the perception of the main text?
Shoot up
I had the exact same impression. Excellent ideas but need more fleshing out
Pretty sure that’s referee 2
I guess they would simply offer a tiered subscription based on how often you can do it
Thanks! I’ll take the downvotes as a good sign on this sub
No idea, just thought it was interesting) I don’t have an NVIDIA GPU.
In a bra, duh
Where do boo bees live?
I just recently read the first Expanse (Leviathan Awakens) and am reading Hyperion. Depends on what you are in a mood for. Expanse is more action-packed and easier to follow. Hyperion is higher up there, takes time to digest.
Not as high as reading Annihilation
Thanks for a detailed response. Just started reading the Fall of Hyperion
I knew I was in the right place
They talk about many things, but the one that stands out is incentives. There is a lot of competition in academia, publish or perish, with big prizes, so some people are taking shortcuts.
These were great, really enjoyed them, especially the coverage of the Data Colada story
Or the only person who phrases your issue this way) so many times I’ve found out that I just state my problem in an unusual way