The gaming industry turned its back on gamers a long time ago by making it difficult to truly own a game. It’s no wonder people want to go back and play old games that don’t rely on a server somewhere that could be shutdown at any point.
- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
mrnngglry@sh.itjust.worksto
Linux@programming.dev•Ubuntu's trust problem in 4 concrete issues - verified facts, no FUD
22·2 months agoThat is a fundamental difference, the Universe repository is community maintained outside of the Pro service. It always was before Pro too. I don’t think Fedora has a separate repo for community-maintained packages. I still don’t see the issue with offering something above and beyond what you traditionally have and charging a fee for it. They could just have easily never provided official support for Universe.
mrnngglry@sh.itjust.worksto
Linux@programming.dev•Ubuntu's trust problem in 4 concrete issues - verified facts, no FUD
11·2 months agoWould MX Linux with KDE fit your needs?
mrnngglry@sh.itjust.worksto
Linux@programming.dev•Ubuntu's trust problem in 4 concrete issues - verified facts, no FUD
11·2 months agodeleted by creator
mrnngglry@sh.itjust.worksto
Linux@programming.dev•Ubuntu's trust problem in 4 concrete issues - verified facts, no FUD
23·2 months agoWrong. They merely stop supporting it when a new version is released, just like everyone else. You can skip Pro and get the same experience you get with any other distro.
mrnngglry@sh.itjust.worksto
Linux@programming.dev•Ubuntu's trust problem in 4 concrete issues - verified facts, no FUD
33·2 months agoThey’re giving you 10 years of updates on those packages for free? I know Alma is from Tux Care but that extended support comes at a price as well. Leap is two years. LMDE support ends soon after the newest version. Fedora gets 13 months after the newest version I believe. Maybe I’m wrong on some of those but none of those come close to the free support canonical provides on LTS or Pro.
mrnngglry@sh.itjust.worksto
Linux@programming.dev•Ubuntu's trust problem in 4 concrete issues - verified facts, no FUD
43·2 months agoRight, but if you’re after the level of “stability” that Canonical is offering, where are you getting it for free? Maybe there is another place but none that I’m aware of. I think it is perfectly fine for them to charge for that, especially if enterprise customers are the target audience and those who aren’t don’t have to pay for it.
mrnngglry@sh.itjust.worksto
Linux@programming.dev•Ubuntu's trust problem in 4 concrete issues - verified facts, no FUD
52·2 months agoThey also don’t provide those updates. I am a Fedora guy by the way. I’m not defending Canonical, just pointing out that this is a silly reason to dislike them.
mrnngglry@sh.itjust.worksto
Linux@programming.dev•Ubuntu's trust problem in 4 concrete issues - verified facts, no FUD
187·2 months agoThey are security updates that were never available otherwise. They didn’t take something that was freely available and put it behind a paywall. It was a new service.
mrnngglry@sh.itjust.worksto
Linux@programming.dev•Ubuntu's trust problem in 4 concrete issues - verified facts, no FUD
182·2 months agoThe updates available through Ubuntu Pro wouldn’t have normally been available prior to Pro. It’s an added service, not something that was previously available that is now locked behind a paywall. There are plenty of reasons to not like Canonical but this isn’t one.

Malware? You say you’re sharing the truth but make such claims without proof.