They were (allegedly) trying to “balance” public safety and privacy?
Why would they “balance” two things they absolutely DO NOT care about?
They were (allegedly) trying to “balance” public safety and privacy?
Why would they “balance” two things they absolutely DO NOT care about?
Fuck tolerance.
See? It’s that easy. No paradoxes required.
It is only a matter of time before pigs or some paramilitary pig-wannabes perpetrate a massacre of protestors in the US.
When (not if) they do, watch out… it will be open-season on anybody that’s marginalized or slightly left than Heinrich Himmler.
I sure hope you all are ready for this.
you also have to convince them it’s worth getting shot over.
When they start shooting protestors, the time for protest is over.
Yeah the democrats were weak when it comes to Gaza.
The Dems were not “weak” on Gaza - they very strongly supported their favorite little genocidal white supremacist colonialist project.
But, they didn’t say “the west bank is yours for the taking. Go get!”
Nobody “handed” Israel the West Bank - the IDF can concentrate on the West Bank now because they were too entangled by their abysmal failure to beat Hamas in Gaza.
largely peaceful anti-israel protests that were commonplace under the democrats will now get violently shut down by autocratic style policing
Good. The people doing “peaceful” protest needs to learn what “peaceful” protest amounts to one way or the other.
Also trump has an extremely pro Israeli track record
So does the entire US political establishment, including anyone the Dems will allow as a presidential candidate.
PTB or CLM… I’m torn.
Your take on this is as shit as any other emanating from the lemmy.world liberal hivemind, but I don’t think the ban was justified (at least not according to the available information).
Believing a politician actually cares about you is like believing the stripper likes you,
Hey, come now… there’s no need to compare those parasites to strippers.
This is true… but it doesn’t change the power dynamic at play at all - merely the stakes for the individual involved.
Yea but the charity has to be nice to you since they depend on volunteers.
How is this any different from the, “if you don’t like your job you can just leave” argument?
The presence of a safe word doesn’t exclude the existence of a hierarchy in the same way that “checks and balances” doesn’t make a hierarchy any less hierarchical.
Voluntary hierarchies are not a thing.
Sounds like a shittake emanating from the same kind of anarchists that loudly proclaim the values of “leaderless” organisation before posting a meme glorifying Nestor Makhno.
Anarchy will always be the extreme left into the political pendulum.
Anarchism is “extreme” left now? Since when?
This sounds no different than the “far left” bullcrap liberals and their fascist cousins have been peddling in the last while.
YDI.
You’re a genocide denier. No ifs, ands or buts.
Seems like a surefire way to get a promotion these days.