That would make more sense if redfash weren’t some of his biggest supporters

I’m guessing you don’t watch South Park

It’s the difference between those for whom leftism is an aesthetic and those who want material progress. Those who value the aesthetic can’t bear to compromise their aesthetic by voting for Harris, while those who care about people’s material conditions and doing work to actually make progress do vote for her.

What a compelling rebuttal of their points /s

The endorsement I’ve been waiting for

Yeah but you have terrible taste. Thanks! :)

“leftist”

The Senate investigation found nothing illegal. That doesn’t mean Stein isn’t trying to help russian interests.

https://github.com/fork-maintainers/iceraven-browser

Republicans never claimed not to be pedophiles, so I think that’s on us for assuming

Telegram users have never had privacy. Group chats are completely in the open and private messages are only encrypted if both users turn it on for each conversation—and it’s off by default. I’ve never understood why anyone thinks Telegram is any better than posting anywhere else on the internet.

The question of why specific immigrants are here isn’t relevant to the topic of how they should be treated once they’re legally here. Some are here bc of bad US foreign policy, others aren’t, but all should be treated with respect.

Cluster munitions are bad when you’re an invading army bc some of the explosives fail to fire, endangering civilians who come across them later. Ukraine, however, is using them on its own territory to combat russia who 1) is already using cluster munitions with a greater fail rate than the ones the US is providing Ukraine, and 2) deliberately mines the areas they invade in a way to kill civilians (e.g. setting up a mine to explode if you try to move the corpse of a beloved family dog). So in this case, using the US’s cluster munitions to get russia out is a net positive.

Better would be the marxists pushing the gas pedal to run over everyone on the red track, hoping that someone else will then rise up to stop the trolley

There’s a preprint paper out that claims to prove that the technology used in LLMs will never be able to be extended to AGI, due to the exponentially increasing demand for resources they’d require. I don’t know enough formal CS to evaluate their methods, but to the extent I understand their argument, it is compelling.

I have tried–the instructions are woefully inadequate. I tried following them to build Ventoy and had to make numerous modifications just to get the first couple of components to build. At that point I gave up

Everyone will call you friend as long as you agree with them. And libs punch Nazis. Are you a Nazi?

You mean like “shitlib”?

Because there’s nothing to understand. Have the day you deserve!

No, it doesn’t. Just repeating a statement, slightly modified, doesn’t mean it makes sense.