Pic looks older though. Is it from a time when people still thought putin could be reasoned with?

I hate your coworker

Probably a Mossad op, so Bibi can get his supporter Trump into office.

No dood, the contest, not the election itself smh

I prefer social media where people post because they have content, need help or want to discuss something, not just post to be hip or the site is popular.

I hope not. Imagine all the crazies.

Wanna bet? It’s either Trump or Harris. You think like a loser.

There’s not such thing as “wasted votes”.

In electoral college and winner-takes-it-all systems (like the one in use in that election) votes for candidates not endorsed by large groups of voters have no effect on the outcome. You can lie to yourself, but this is not a European country. If a party doesn’t get a huge group of voters committed long before the election, it’s over for them.

Yes, people can vote for whoever they like, but only two options ultimately count. The rest is basically discarded on the electors stage.

dood, the election contest is over now. you’re chasing ghosts of the past

No, you’re intentionally ignorant.

If both are unsuitable for the climate cause, it doesn’t mean you get a 3rd option. It means the climate is irrelevant for this election. In that case you lost the chance to have a climate relevant option many years ago. Voting a 3rd party or not voting will not pressure the candidates to do anything for the climate now. Even the threat of letting the authoritarian fascist win comes too late, because third parties are already out.

Also, if the US doesn’t elect the democrat candidate now, trump will be elected and there will be no way of doing anything for the climate with the US any more, likely forever.

The ship has sailed. You can only choose how bad you lose now.

dood. the problem is, you wrote

Anyone who call to imperatively vote for the red and blue party is an enemy of the climate cause and of humanity.

Which in an electoral college system means you want votes to be wasted and increase the risk the orange menace wins, who is the bigger enemy of the climate cause and of humanity.

Basically your words contradict your goals at the moment and it even raises the suspicion you’re trying to manipulate ppl for the GOP or foreign actors (which favor the GOP).

This is not the time to vote 3rd party or abstain. This is lesser evil time. The US isn’t a country where this is done with coalitions like in EU or so. If you wanted a 3rd party to win this election, that ship has sailed. For the next, maybe, but don’t confuse ppl who should vote now.

Exactly as intended.

Habe irgendwo auf Englisch gelesen, wir machen alternativ Nur-Nuss-November (Nonstop Nut November)

let’s say you’re on an android phone. you click share, if possible with the url of your home instance, pick calendar, choose a date and save. that seems much better than controlling a bot.

That ship has sailed, but you have to sign up with a mail account that offers throw away addresses (like yahoo! mail or others). They just put the mails from all throwaways also into you main mailbox. If later you can’t ubsubscribe, you can just delete the throwaway. Only problem is, for replies you have to use the mail providers way (i.e. webmailer) so your client doesn’t reply with your main address. But I found it very rare I reply to mails from subscriptions.

[meta] that’s it. i’m confused again if i should upvote or downvote in this community. upvoting gives op just more visibility for their shenanigans. so now i’ll just block the whole stupid community. i’m sick of every day being opposite day.

look, when it freezes and russia gained land, it’s like a win for them. it will encourage them to rearm and start over or attack another country, then freeze again. over and over. some people are assholes and you can’t have peace with them, because of them, not you. they will always start a war again, if they don’t have to fear being destroyed or at least lose a bit of their territory.

i understand you want the killing to stop and it’s good and where we should be heading, but there hasn’t been a single day in more than 5000 years without an armed conflict and we just don’t know how much before that, because there’s not much recorded. humans are not there yet. the asshole to peaceful ratio is not in our favor.

the vast majority of russians likes this war. as long as they do, there will be no peace. every ceasefire will be broken by them. for them to stop, they must be destroyed. it’s like Germany back in WW2. Germany had to be beaten and destroyed to become a normal, non-aggresive nation. it sucks, but this is how humans are at the moment.

depends where the borders currently are at, when it freezes

Sometimes it takes a world war to end a war.

Of course it is. It’s very confusing and bizarre NK did that. It’s like a clown ran on stage during the chainsaw juggling.