• 3 Posts
  • 70 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: November 8th, 2023

help-circle
















  • I don’t know what you are even arguing. My point is India is democratic and secular despite being flawed. Do you not agree with that? If you don’t agree with that, why are you worried about the word “secular” being removed? How does it matter anyway?

    Your incident counting means nothing - India has 1.4B people. Obviously you can find more cases LMAO.

    My point is India is democratic and secular - and that’s an achievement in South Asia (that’s why compared to Pakistan). And that has made it more developed. So democracy and secularism are good ideals to fight for.

    If India is not better off than Pakistan and Bangladesh, might as well let BJP make it non secular like them? Why bother fighting it?




  • no refugees

    Not true - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_to_India

    fall to the Hindu majority who would nationilze around their identity and oppress everyone else which is exactly what happend

    It’s not even close to that. For sure there needs to be big improvements in minority rights but it’s not even close to what Pakistan (and Bangladesh) are. India is heavily flawed but still has a functional democracy and secular state while not a single PM in Pakistan has completed a full term. Lol like they are not even comparable. If anything, India is an achievement of secularism and a good example of why you should separate the church and state.

    just gives credit for Pakistan’s purpose

    Now that is a circular argument because the nationalists say “look at Pakistan and Bangladesh, Muslims got that, why aren’t we getting one?”. So creation of Pakistan is what gives credit to their argument.

    For its purpose of avoiding being an oppressed minority, it succeded.

    Did they? Do Pakistani Muslims lead better life than Indian Muslims?