• 293 Posts
  • 4.65K Comments
Joined 2 年前
Cake day: 2023年7月7日
  • just_another_person@lemmy.worldtoLinux@programming.dev•Debian (12/13): Wireguard VPN-client
    2·
    4 天前

    If your routes aren’t changing, then your device, as a client, isn’t going to reach anything. You’ll need to see a route for the 10.20.0.0/24 subnet show up that points to whatever the endpoint address is on the other end.

    So if that’s all your server config is, it’s only going to allow one peer at a time. You can confirm this by disconnecting your android device from the tunnel, and then connecting using the same info from your Linux device.

    You also at a minimum should have PostUP and PostDown directives to properly forward incoming traffic on your wg interface.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.worldtoLinux@programming.dev•Should we be wary of Red Hat?
    23·
    10 天前

    Nah, you weren’t. Nobody was using it in a “commercial setting” in 1991. In fact, it didn’t even do anything in 1991 boot sort of boot, and it had a somewhat functional input and TCP/IP stack if you were lucky enough to even keep it stable enough. People weren’t even using it in research settings in 1991 for this reason, because the very basic running kernel released in September of that year with ZERO functionality but the above.

    I don’t even want to continue to railing on you, but your post history has all the facts of your first uses of Linux in between a bunch of far-right conspiracy junk, anti-vax ranting, and Doomsday Prepper thoughts, and then a bunch of overstating your expertise in seemingly everything that contradicts previous statements you change at will to make a point.

    You’re just a sub-par Internet troll, guy. The fact you even asked this question is hilarious because you don’t understand the need for LTS focused releases of a distro 😂

  • just_another_person@lemmy.worldtoLinux@programming.dev•Should we be wary of Red Hat?
    411·
    10 天前

    Let me pick this apart piece by piece because you don’t understand how any of this works, and for your uninformed answer from AI or Reddit:

    1. A Trademark is nothing more than branding. Meaningless. The substance of the project is MIT Licensed which means…open.
    2. As you can read in their Charter docs: “Many basic decisions are made through a process known as “lazy approval”, in which general consent is assumed unless valid objections are raised within a period of time…” So, no, Red Hat as an entity isn’t making decisions in the direction of the project.
    3. Fedora ecosystem is one group of devs working on a specific line of tooling centered around rolling releases. Alma and Rocky have their own, which is mostly a free version of RHEL focused on LTS releases (not desktop). Two factions of the same coin with different goals.
    4. In Fedora forums you’re wondering why Fedora people would suggest Fedora Server??? See #3. They have completely different use-cases and userbase.
  • just_another_person@lemmy.worldtoLinux@programming.dev•Should we be wary of Red Hat?
    1922·
    10 天前

    🙄

    This dumb thread comes up every few years from paranoid people new to the community who don’t understand how this ecosystem works.

    There are countless threads and blog posts about this, so I’m not sure why you’re bringing your paranoia here to kick up some fear mongering or whatever your intent is, but let me break it down for you:

    1. Fedora is its own entity
    2. Red Hat is a for-profit company
    3. Red Hat doesn’t own Fedora
    4. Red Hat contributes assets to many FOSS initiatives, not just Fedora
    5. Yes, some RH employees also work on Fedora. It’s free contribution. Same as Canonical, Valve, IBM, Universities, and other private companies.
    6. There is nothing to be “weary” of because if something were to change about the Fedora ecosystem that didn’t benefit users, guess what? There will be instant forks, and a massive shift away from that community. Red Hat knows this because they aren’t fools.
    7. People aren’t “shilling” for Fedora. It’s the new standard for well-built and easy to run distro since Canonical decided to ruin Ubuntu (see point #6)

    Red Hat EMPLOYS many contributors straight out of open source projects, and also just directly funds projects they want to see improve. So do other corporate entities. You know Redis was basically single-handedly funded by Amazon for multiple years so the project would upstream features they requested? Also many Apache projects, memcached, ELK, Grafana…etc.

    Get outta here with the shit-stirring for absolutely no good reason 🤦

  • just_another_person@lemmy.worldtoFuturology@futurology.today•US startup Magrathea’s new electrolyzer can make magnesium from sea water using electricity.English
    2·
    19 天前

    Another startup claiming a breakthrough on old tech. This isn’t anything new, and barely an improvement on elctrolyzers from the 50’s.

    The same problem exists with this as any other seawater extraction process: there will be byproducts that need to be disposed of. Desalinization creates a toxic brine, and this process will create a solution of seawater minus character components. This process takes seawater and removes Magnesium Chloride, keeps it in a molten state, then removes the magnesium. So you’re left with Magnesium, Magnesium Oxide as the useful byproducts, BUT…also Mercury, Lead, Sulphurous waste…etc.

    While they say they intend to run “net-zero emissions”, I believe they are strictly speaking about the energy needed to run the machines, NOT the toxic byproducts that are left behind. Desalinization projects all over the world have cause ecological disasters in their attempts to manage and deal with the waste products leftover, and this will be no different unless they also plan to process every seawater component down to its component form and use or sequester that…somehow.