ji59

I believe it it were illegal, it wouldn’t be so popular and people would have to hide it more. Illegality would bring more barriers to use it and since people are lazy less poeple would be interested.

But personally I think the solution is for people to stop being so sensitive to nudity. If someone would post naked pictures of me I wouldn’t be happy, but either devastated. And if it were AI generated I could simply avoid it by saying that ain’t me.

But I would argue its harder to put extra heat into sand that has already 2000K, and also bigger heat loss. But I don’t know anything about how it works, just some common sense.

Isn’t Smite exactly this?

Wow, blame the user for manufacturing decisions. Give me an example of alternative with quality camera, wireless charging, water resistance, …
I laughed at Apple (BTW Samsung too) for the aweful cutoff at the top of the screen, for the lack of headphone jack, SD card reader. Now it’s impossible to find powerful phone with these things. So please don’t blame users for stupid corporate decisions.
Also broken glass back compromises water resistance and could be safety hazard if the shards fall of.

Interesting idea to put wireless devices under the screen, but I don’t think it would be easy to implement. There would be a lot of interference with screen circuits. Also no phone usage while charging. I think it’s better if they stay on the back.

Wireless charging and contactless payments are the main reason manufactures switched from metal covers to glass.
The only reasons people use glass are scratch resistance and because plastic “feels cheap”. I also hate this transition to glass and am glad my Fairphone doesn’t have one.

I think they use base 1 because they have 1 “finger” on each leg

Have you seen how many rocks she has? Even I would be happy with that many

F

There are always a lot of people to fuck. But these two are dragging their population to unnecessary war.

Why nobody thinks about the stakeholders?
We have seen in Africa that children don’t have to have lunch. But stakeholders are the real victims

Fuck Putin and fuck Netanyahu

NewPipe works by fetching the required data from the official API (e.g. PeerTube) of the service you’re using. If the official API is restricted (e.g. YouTube) for our purposes, or is proprietary, the app parses the website or uses an internal API instead. This means that you don’t need an account on any service to use NewPipe.

So NewPipe doesn’t use yt API and it never accepted its terms, so NewPipe is safe (from my understanding)

…PUBLISHES OR DISTRIBUTES MATERIAL HARMFUL TO MINORS ON THE INTERNET FROM A WEBSITE THAT CONTAINS A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF MATERIAL HARMFUL TO MINORS…
Since furry porn isn’t harmful, they should be ok.

I have Fairphone 5 and it’s not bad. Little bit pricey and no wireless charging or headphone jack but it should last really long with spare parts for years and easy fix.

I bought Oculus Quest 1. OCULUS! Facebook promised to leave them alone, for them to remain oculus, But after a year or so, merging started, firstly with oculus accounts vanishing into fb, then renaming to Meta Quest and now the only thing that remain is logo.

They claim that I violated their social media policy, but will not respond to me with how I violated it.

WTH is social media policy? Is it written somewhere that employees can’t have OF? (And also who found her on OF and snitch on her?)

other countries are “not sending their finest”

Yeah, that’s kinda true now, only insane would like to live in the US in this economy.
Jokes aside, a few people around me would at least think about it.

I know that POC lived in England and it was possible to meet someone like that. But I would prefer if the model gave most possible, most general answers. If I ask for an image of a car I would like to give me four-wheeled red or gray or green car, not three-wheeled pink car just because there exist some car like that.

The problem is that these answers are hugely incorrect and if some child learning about history of England would see this, they would create bias that England was always diverse.
The same is true for some recent post, where people knowing nothing about Scotland history could learn from images that half of Scotland population in 18th century was black.
So from my perspective these images are just completely wrong and it should be fixed.
Also if you want diversity, what about handicapped people?