Wow seems like nice article

Open

Start reading (first few sentences)

Large medium pop-up covering everything

Close tab, I am good

I 100% agree with you and would love to see Anthropic burn (same as OpenAI and all other big tech)

The intention may be good, but there is the fediverse and a large set of complete, polished and battle tested open source solutions, why not build on top of that?

@[email protected] tbh I could see people who are considered good programmers in one place but not in another place (just prompting to get things done with minimum effort & reserving the effort for something else). Probably it comes back to interest & care, how much the person is interested in iterating over their solution & architecture + learning things regardless of seniority level to achieve a higher level goal (simpler design for example rather than stopping when it works). Maybe that could be an indication of a good programmer?

yep, they are selling learning models, but they are not pretending medical doctors will be out of work next week like OpenAI is doing

Go check HN comments, the delusion is out of the roof like always. They flipped the story to a human could have done worse and this is a good outcome. I punched you for no reason but somebody else you have done worse so I am good.

wow, that’s too much effort that Netflix can kill in a single change. I would rather cancel sub and torrent shit (already did that)

ok granpa what about another nap now?

Dude, he saved humanity with the GNU project and FSF. I want myself and my kids to be that and not Gates, Musk, …

the same reason a person gets 40 year prison for having CP materials (rightefully so), but politicians and billionaires are all straight up pedos going for trafficked minors in an island get a comfy government cover up

bruh, so it’s not me who was stupid all this time for not being able to put an estimate for large initiatives. It always feels forced to give an estimate.

It has been really fun watching any LLM debugging a bug in a moderately large codebase. It has been so bad in my experience (I really wanted the hype to be real) even in really simple and readable programming languages.

It doesn’t stand a chance though for more complex languages. There was an obvious bug in the way one Rust project was loading a config, decided to “test” Claude sonnet 4.5, I watched it identifying the issue but over engineering paragraphs of new Rust utilities without getting there while the solution was in the second paragraph of the github repo of config-rs, just adjusting the prefix and dropping the separator entry.

I started walking 33 years ago, I am by no mean an expert in walking.

deleted by creator

cool, I guess I will switch back to trading shitcoins if this is what everyone expects because I am definitely not cut to jerk off a manager providing infinitely less value than me

So far and in my experience Claude fails at something miserably: maintenance of non-trivial code bases (which is 90% of the job in established places). So what’s the plan here? Claude writes 99% of stuff and you hire a lot of people to fix bugs and add features in a project they are not experts at?

I am fine if the industry or the entire planet collapses, I am just sick of CEOs making self serving predictions without thinking them through.

wow, I am definitely checking this out.

First time I have heard about such concepts was 2015 for my phd studies. Radar imaging, through the wall imaging, it introduced me to the large math framework of inverse and ill-posed problems.

then “proceeds to fire more”

That’s a solid point. Even if it looks great (most of the time not). I try to build small predictable parts, refactoring, … Even with all precaution, I find tech debt hidden somewhere weeks and months later.

I use LLMs extensively for work as people think we are faster now but try to avoid letting LLMs write anything for personal projects.

deleted by creator