![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/2665e448-91d9-484d-919d-113c9715fc79.png)
The execs are certainly living up to the crazy portion of the name
The execs are certainly living up to the crazy portion of the name
I feel like there might be a culture gap here. OP hasn’t mentioned where he’s from, or what his neighborhood is like. I’ve lived in places where women do NOT want to be alone at any time, and I suspect many of the commentors here have never experienced a place like that.
It might just be an unhealthy relationship, but depending on context, it might be a very reasonable and understandable reaction.
PS - none of this is gaslighting. OP, do you even know what it means?
Edit: Nvm, OP mentioned they live in a safe city in the comments. Proceed with the traditional calls for breakup!
I think that’s kinda the point of the comic…
Have you ever dealt with 8 year olds? They would have asked all the poop related questions anyway
Why btd 5 over btd 6?
Coursework can be similarly adapted.
How?
I believe in not kink shaming, but that’s just TMI
Jaw vs chin, I’m guessing the difference is fairly small.
Just picked up Bloons 6, (~$1, 90% off) for those who like tower defense games. Lots of unlockable content and metaprogression, if that’s your jam.
A lot of students do not perform well under exam conditions due to stress and pressure. Also, unless you’re entirely eliminating coursework, it doesn’t remove the issue.
The point that I and others have made, is that all states in existence today are ultimately founded on colonialism. It’s disingenuous to suggest that some are innocent of it. They are not, they merely finished earlier. Given that, why do some states deserve to be dismantled but not others?
If the purpose is to halt the process of colonialism, there are ways to do so that are less drastic and controversial, and more likely to have a net positive result for all parties involved (or happen at all).
Colonialism is not a rare event, it happens ALL THE TIME, EVERYWHERE. If you’re only finding fault with the ongoing efforts, and giving the rest a pass because they are no longer visible in your day-to-day life, you are effectively saying success justifies it. Otherwise, you’re just being arbitrary and inconsistent.
Straight to you, from the makers of Stagnetti’s Revenge…
The difference is that the settler romans and indigenous population at this point are indistinguishable from each other
So what you’re saying is, if one side fully wipes out and/or swallows up the other fully, colonialism is then ok. How is that different from what Israel is currently trying to accomplish? If they succeed, in a century or two somebody would be saying the same thing you are now.
You’re in the wrong sub to be reasonable.
My point being, go far enough back, and you WILL have found a people or tribe that got wiped out so another group could claim their territory. Where do you (arbitrarily) draw the line?
Unless you’re asserting that none of your ancestors have ever claimed land at the expense of somebody else, you’re a colonist.
IF she threw the liquid at him, and he punched her in retaliation, who’s actually in the wrong, legal-wise?